Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
City of Dickinson v. Helgeson
SC North Dakota · Feb 12, 2026
ND / stateEditorial impact: mediumpro sefake citationsothertrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Court found the cited State v. Rogers, 2006 ND 85 712 N.W.2d 841 listed by Helgeson did not match the authority he relied on and was among the fictitious citations. Outcome: Monetary Sanction.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court found the cited State v. Rogers, 2006 ND 85 712 N.W.2d 841 listed by Helgeson did not match the authority he relied on and was among the fictitious citations. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'State v. Clark, 2012 ND 135, 818 N.W.2d 739' among other offered authorities; the court determined several of these offered citations were fictitious or misleading. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court found 'State ex rel. Olson v. City of Fargo, 250 N.W.2d 558 (N.D. 1977)' does not exist; court matched it to unrelated real reporters/titles and deemed it fictitious. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court determined the cited State v. $44,140.00 U.S. Currency, 2003 ND 28 657 N.W.2d 829 is a nonexistent authority in Helgeson's brief. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court identified the citation State v. Clark, 2022 ND 85 999 N.W.2d 632 in Helgeson's brief as not corresponding to the asserted authority and found it fictitious as presented. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court concluded the citation State ex rel. Stenehjem v. FreeEats.com Inc., 712 N.W.2d 828, 841 (N.D. 2006) as used by Helgeson was not an accurate existing authority and was treated as fictitious. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'State ex rel. Olson v. City of Fargo, 250 N/A' in his brief; the court found the citation to be nonexistent after searching and listed a different, genuine Olson decision as unrelated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'State v. $44,140.00 U.S. Currency, 2003 ND 28, 657 N.W.2d 829' which the court determined did not exist as offered and did not support his arguments. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'State v. $44,140.00 U.S. Currency, 2012 ND 176, 820 N.W.2d 697' as authority; the court found the offered citation to be fictitious and not the authority relied upon. || Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'State v. Clark, 2022 ND 85, 999 N.W.2d 632' in his brief but the court found the citation did not correspond to supporting authority as offered. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court found 'State v. $44,140.00 U.S. Currency, 2003 ND 28 657 N.W.2d 829' as offered by Helgeson was nonexistent or misreferenced and did not support his claims. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court identified 'State v. $44,140.00 U.S. Currency, 2012 ND 176, 820 N.W.2d 697' in Helgeson's brief as a non-existent or incorrect citation and treated it as fictitious. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court noted 'State v. Clark, 2022 ND 85, 999 N.W.2d 632' as offered by Helgeson did not correspond to the cited authorities and was treated as a nonexistent/misleading citation. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court found 'State ex rel. Stenehjem v. FreeEats.com Inc., 712 N.W.2d 828, 841 (N.D. 2006)' in Helgeson's brief to be a fictitious citation that did not exist as cited. || Fabricated: Case Law | Court found the cited State ex rel. Olson v. City of Fargo, 250 N.W.2d 558 (N.D. 1977) does not exist and the offered citation does not support Helgeson's claim.
- Why it matters now
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in SC North Dakota, with the listed outcome: Monetary Sanction.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Court found the cited State v. Rogers, 2006 ND 85 712 N.W.2d 841 listed by Helgeson did not match the authority he relied on and was among the fictitious citations. Outcome: Monetary Sanction.
Operational lesson
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in SC North Dakota, with the listed outcome: Monetary Sanction.
Record details
North DakotaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtSC North Dakota
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit8th Circuit
DateFeb 12, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeMonetary Sanction
Known amount$500
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Monetary Sanction
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
15 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court found the cited State v. Rogers, 2006 ND 85 712 N.W.2d 841 listed by Helgeson did not match the authority he relied on and was among the fictitious citations.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'State v. Clark, 2012 ND 135, 818 N.W.2d 739' among other offered authorities; the court determined several of these offered citations were fictitious or misleading.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court found 'State ex rel. Olson v. City of Fargo, 250 N.W.2d 558 (N.D. 1977)' does not exist; court matched it to unrelated real reporters/titles and deemed it fictitious.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court determined the cited State v. $44,140.00 U.S. Currency, 2003 ND 28 657 N.W.2d 829 is a nonexistent authority in Helgeson's brief.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court identified the citation State v. Clark, 2022 ND 85 999 N.W.2d 632 in Helgeson's brief as not corresponding to the asserted authority and found it fictitious as presented.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court concluded the citation State ex rel. Stenehjem v. FreeEats.com Inc., 712 N.W.2d 828, 841 (N.D. 2006) as used by Helgeson was not an accurate existing authority and was treated as fictitious.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'State ex rel. Olson v. City of Fargo, 250 N/A' in his brief; the court found the citation to be nonexistent after searching and listed a different, genuine Olson decision as unrelated.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'State v. $44,140.00 U.S. Currency, 2003 ND 28, 657 N.W.2d 829' which the court determined did not exist as offered and did not support his arguments.
Show 7 additional discrepancies
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'State v. $44,140.00 U.S. Currency, 2012 ND 176, 820 N.W.2d 697' as authority; the court found the offered citation to be fictitious and not the authority relied upon.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited 'State v. Clark, 2022 ND 85, 999 N.W.2d 632' in his brief but the court found the citation did not correspond to supporting authority as offered.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court found 'State v. $44,140.00 U.S. Currency, 2003 ND 28 657 N.W.2d 829' as offered by Helgeson was nonexistent or misreferenced and did not support his claims.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court identified 'State v. $44,140.00 U.S. Currency, 2012 ND 176, 820 N.W.2d 697' in Helgeson's brief as a non-existent or incorrect citation and treated it as fictitious.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court noted 'State v. Clark, 2022 ND 85, 999 N.W.2d 632' as offered by Helgeson did not correspond to the cited authorities and was treated as a nonexistent/misleading citation.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court found 'State ex rel. Stenehjem v. FreeEats.com Inc., 712 N.W.2d 828, 841 (N.D. 2006)' in Helgeson's brief to be a fictitious citation that did not exist as cited.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court found the cited State ex rel. Olson v. City of Fargo, 250 N.W.2d 558 (N.D. 1977) does not exist and the offered citation does not support Helgeson's claim.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in City of Dickinson v. Helgeson?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court found the cited State v. Rogers, 2006 ND 85 712 N.W.2d 841 listed by Helgeson did not match the authority he relied on and was among the fictitious citations. Outcome: Monetary Sanction.
- Why does City of Dickinson v. Helgeson matter for legal AI risk?
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in SC North Dakota, with the listed outcome: Monetary Sanction.
- What does the public record establish about City of Dickinson v. Helgeson?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this City of Dickinson v. Helgeson summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.