AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 20, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 15, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesDeen v. VMK, Inc.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 80/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Deen v. VMK, Inc.

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

CA California (6d) · Oct 13, 2026

CA / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationstortappellateNone Adjudicated
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a nonexistent California appellate case and attributed to it the proposition that litigation conduct shows a consciousness of guilt and is highly probative of scienter. The court expressly stated that People v. Sokolow does not exist and rejected the associated argument.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in CA California (6d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a nonexistent California appellate case and attributed to it the proposition that litigation conduct shows a consciousness of guilt and is highly probative of scienter. The court expressly stated that People v. Sokolow does not exist and rejected the associated argument.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in CA California (6d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope
Explore CAOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtCA California (6d)
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit9th Circuit
DateOct 13, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a nonexistent California appellate case and attributed to it the proposition that litigation conduct shows a consciousness of guilt and is highly probative of scienter. The court expressly stated that People v. Sokolow does not exist and rejected the associated argument.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Deen v. VMK, Inc.?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a nonexistent California appellate case and attributed to it the proposition that litigation conduct shows a consciousness of guilt and is highly probative of scienter. The court expressly stated that People v. Sokolow does not exist and rejected the associated argument.
Why does Deen v. VMK, Inc. matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in CA California (6d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Deen v. VMK, Inc.?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Deen v. VMK, Inc. summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

In re the Marriage of Joanne Rodrigues and Nathan CraigCA California (6d) · Apr 22, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsMichael T-Alexander v. Michelle Baass et al.CA California (6d) · Apr 14, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsArno Kuigoua v. Adam Michael SacksCA California (2nd) · Mar 10, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citationsAnthony Jama Hall v. Superior Court of Sacramento CountyCA California · Feb 25, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citationsKuigoua v. ParkCA California · Nov 10, 2025same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citationsAli Jabbari v. Parviz Omidvar, et al.C.D. California · Aug 3, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations
Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.