HomeCasesDorsey v. Ponce, et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Dorsey v. Ponce, et al.

N.D. Illinois · Dec 4, 2025

IL / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationscivil rightstrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'State v. Slowikowski, Ohio 2003,' which the court could not locate and flagged as an invalid/nonexistent citation. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'State v. Slowikowski, Ohio 2003,' which the court could not locate and flagged as an invalid/nonexistent citation. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'U.S. v. Weaver, 9th Circuit, 2016,' which the court was unable to find and identified as an incorrect or nonexistent citation. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Mackey v. Town of Allendale, 2021,' a citation the court could not locate and treated as invalid/fabricated. || Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Sanchez v. Dart, 2016,' which the court could not find (noting a different case with that caption exists from 2020), treating the 2016 citation as invalid.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in N.D. Illinois, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'State v. Slowikowski, Ohio 2003,' which the court could not locate and flagged as an invalid/nonexistent citation. Outcome: Warning.

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in N.D. Illinois, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

IllinoisSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtN.D. Illinois

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit7th Circuit

DateDec 4, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'State v. Slowikowski, Ohio 2003,' which the court could not locate and flagged as an invalid/nonexistent citation.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'U.S. v. Weaver, 9th Circuit, 2016,' which the court was unable to find and identified as an incorrect or nonexistent citation.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Mackey v. Town of Allendale, 2021,' a citation the court could not locate and treated as invalid/fabricated.
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Sanchez v. Dart, 2016,' which the court could not find (noting a different case with that caption exists from 2020), treating the 2016 citation as invalid.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Dorsey v. Ponce, et al.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'State v. Slowikowski, Ohio 2003,' which the court could not locate and flagged as an invalid/nonexistent citation. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Dorsey v. Ponce, et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in N.D. Illinois, with the listed outcome: Warning.
What does the public record establish about Dorsey v. Ponce, et al.?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Dorsey v. Ponce, et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Ifeoma Delliane Chinedu Obi v. Cook County, Illinois, et al. (2)N.D. Illinois · Jun 10, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Faisal Rahman v. Michael J. Burton, et al.N.D. Illinois · Apr 30, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Bettis v. GastonN.D. Illinois · Feb 9, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Steven E. Hobbs, Sr. v. Igor Goncharko, et al. (2)N.D. Illinois · Jan 16, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Ifeoma Delliane Chinedu Obi v. Cook County, Illinois, et al. (1)N.D. Illinois · Apr 9, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Steven E. Hobbs, Sr. v. Igor Goncharko, et al. (1)N.D. Illinois · Sep 3, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Record details

IllinoisSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtN.D. Illinois

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit7th Circuit

DateDec 4, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'State v. Slowikowski, Ohio 2003,' which the court could not locate and flagged as an invalid/nonexistent citation.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'U.S. v. Weaver, 9th Circuit, 2016,' which the court was unable to find and identified as an incorrect or nonexistent citation.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Mackey v. Town of Allendale, 2021,' a citation the court could not locate and treated as invalid/fabricated.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Sanchez v. Dart, 2016,' which the court could not find (noting a different case with that caption exists from 2020), treating the 2016 citation as invalid.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Dorsey v. Ponce, et al.?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'State v. Slowikowski, Ohio 2003,' which the court could not locate and flagged as an invalid/nonexistent citation. Outcome: Warning.

Why does Dorsey v. Ponce, et al. matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in N.D. Illinois, with the listed outcome: Warning.

What does the public record establish about Dorsey v. Ponce, et al.?

Which source supports this Dorsey v. Ponce, et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.