Expediente 25-000101-1129-AG / Resolución N.º 00874-2026
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Edward Cortes García; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
Tribunal Agrario San José · Aug 28, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Misrepresented: Case Law | The appeal cited this vote for the proposition that tree-removal costs may be shifted to the claimant when the owner accepts removal but lacks interest or resources. The court stated that the attributed vote did not correspond to the subject matter for which it was cited.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies misrepresented authority and trial and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects misrepresented authority and trial with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Tribunal Agrario San José. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Misrepresented: Case Law | The appeal cited this vote for the proposition that tree-removal costs may be shifted to the claimant when the owner accepts removal but lacks interest or resources. The court stated that the attributed vote did not correspond to the subject matter for which it was cited.
This matter connects misrepresented authority and trial with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Tribunal Agrario San José. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The appeal cited this vote for the proposition that tree-removal costs may be shifted to the claimant when the owner accepts removal but lacks interest or resources. The court stated that the attributed vote did not correspond to the subject matter for which it was cited.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The appeal attributed to this vote a rule that a conditional admission binds the judge to the accepted conditions. The court stated that the cited vote did not correspond to the issue of tree cutting or conditional admissions.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The appeal cited this vote for the proposition that a property owner who accepts tree removal but declines its costs may have the claimant perform the work. The court stated that the attributed vote was unrelated to tree cutting or conditional admissions.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Expediente 25-000101-1129-AG / Resolución N.º 00874-2026?
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The appeal cited this vote for the proposition that tree-removal costs may be shifted to the claimant when the owner accepts removal but lacks interest or resources. The court stated that the attributed vote did not correspond to the subject matter for which it was cited.
- Why does Expediente 25-000101-1129-AG / Resolución N.º 00874-2026 matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects misrepresented authority and trial with a recorded judicial or procedural response in Tribunal Agrario San José. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Expediente 25-000101-1129-AG / Resolución N.º 00874-2026?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Expediente 25-000101-1129-AG / Resolución N.º 00874-2026 summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.