HomeCasesGreenfield One III Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Chaney

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Greenfield One III Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Chaney

Delaware Ch. · Dec 18, 2025

DE / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationscontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited Hudson v. Wesley Coll., 2018 WL 2435541, at 3 (Del. Ch. May 30, 2018), which the court found does not exist and called erroneous (likely AI-generated). Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited Hudson v. Wesley Coll., 2018 WL 2435541, at 3 (Del. Ch. May 30, 2018), which the court found does not exist and called erroneous (likely AI-generated).
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in Delaware Ch., with the listed outcome: Warning.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in Delaware Ch., with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

DelawareSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtDelaware Ch.

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit3rd Circuit

DateDec 18, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited Hudson v. Wesley Coll., 2018 WL 2435541, at 3 (Del. Ch. May 30, 2018), which the court found does not exist and called erroneous (likely AI-generated).

Questions this record answers

What happened in Greenfield One III Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Chaney?: Fabricated: Case Law | Defendant cited Hudson v. Wesley Coll., 2018 WL 2435541, at 3 (Del. Ch. May 30, 2018), which the court found does not exist and called erroneous (likely AI-generated). Outcome: Warning.
Why does Greenfield One III Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Chaney matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in Delaware Ch., with the listed outcome: Warning.
What does the public record establish about Greenfield One III Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Chaney?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Greenfield One III Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Chaney summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Re: IMO the Estate of Joseph L. WeddingtonDelaware Ch. · Jan 15, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Dorsey v. JonesDelaware Ch. · Dec 16, 2025same court · fake citations + contract An v. Archblock, Inc.Delaware Ch. · Apr 4, 2025same court · pro se + trial SWSZ Holding v. SZ GlobalSC Delaware · May 27, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations Kevin Leiske et al. v. Robert Gregory Kidd et al.Delaware Ch. · Jul 1, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Jordan v. Beskrone (In re Prehired LLC)D. Delaware (Bankruptcy) · Dec 12, 2025same jurisdiction · pro se + fake citations

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in Delaware Ch., with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

DelawareSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtDelaware Ch.

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit3rd Circuit

DateDec 18, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Questions this record answers

What happened in Greenfield One III Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Chaney?

Why does Greenfield One III Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Chaney matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in Delaware Ch., with the listed outcome: Warning.

What does the public record establish about Greenfield One III Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Chaney?

Which source supports this Greenfield One III Gmbh & Co. Kg v. Chaney summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.