Which source supports this Guertin-Giroux c. Delrue summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

HomeCasesGuertin-Giroux c. Delrue

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 76/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.

Corpus matter record

Guertin-Giroux c. Delrue

TAL Québec · Aug 6, 2026

Canada Editorial impact: low pro se fake citations landlord tenant trial None Adjudicated

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Legal Norm | Witness/locatrice cited legal dispositions generated by her AI tool during testimony; opposing counsel checked and found the provisions were fabricated; Tribunal noted the references were 'hallucinées' by the AI.

Why the court cared: The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in TAL Québec. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in TAL Québec. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtTAL Québec

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateAug 6, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeSee source

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Legal Norm | Witness/locatrice cited legal dispositions generated by her AI tool during testimony; opposing counsel checked and found the provisions were fabricated; Tribunal noted the references were 'hallucinées' by the AI.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Guertin-Giroux c. Delrue?: Fabricated: Legal Norm | Witness/locatrice cited legal dispositions generated by her AI tool during testimony; opposing counsel checked and found the provisions were fabricated; Tribunal noted the references were 'hallucinées' by the AI.
Why does Guertin-Giroux c. Delrue matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in TAL Québec. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Guertin-Giroux c. Delrue?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Guertin-Giroux c. Delrue summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Landscape Engineering Pte Ltd v Dot Safety Solutions Pte Ltd and anotherHigh Court · Oct 15, 2025pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified Peterkin et al v. McIntyre et alD. New Jersey · Jun 26, 2026pro se + fake citations Arbuckle v. Tanner, 2026 NSCA 62N.S. C.A. · Aug 12, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified Egan v Commonwealth of Australia [2026] FCA 1104Federal Court · Aug 11, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified Nicholas Evan Nesbitt v. Trans Union, LLC, et al.W.D. Arkansas · Aug 11, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified Brantford (City) v. Doolittle, 2026 ONCJ 440Ontario CJ · Jul 24, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source Suggest a correction to this record

Public-record statuspublic record, not an allegation-only entry

Indexing eligibilitypublicly indexable with evidence status disclosed

Published and maintained byManu Ayala · AI VortexIndependent legal AI risk intelligence

Corpus snapshot checked Aug 16, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Aug 16, 2026; latest tracked decision Aug 13, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Open TAL Québec profile Explore jurisdiction

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology