Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Hanlon v. Parkersburg City
CC West Virginia · Jan 6, 2026
VA / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationstrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
In Hanlon v. Parkersburg City, Wood County Circuit Judge John D. Beane denied an emergency injunction seeking to halt the city’s sanitation and recycling privatization process. The order said the complaint relied on propositions and authorities that either did not support the claims or did not exist, including two named cases, and concluded it was perhaps entirely drafted with an AI program that hallucinated substantial caselaw.
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law
- Why it matters now
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CC West Virginia, with the listed outcome: Request for injunctive relief dismissed.
Why this matter is tracked
In Hanlon v. Parkersburg City, Wood County Circuit Judge John D. Beane denied an emergency injunction seeking to halt the city’s sanitation and recycling privatization process. The order said the complaint relied on propositions and authorities that either did not support the claims or did not exist, including two named cases, and concluded it was perhaps entirely drafted with an AI program that hallucinated substantial caselaw.
Operational lesson
This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CC West Virginia, with the listed outcome: Request for injunctive relief dismissed.
Record details
VirginiaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtCC West Virginia
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit4th Circuit
DateJan 6, 2026
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeRequest for injunctive relief dismissed
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Request for injunctive relief dismissed
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Hanlon v. Parkersburg City?
- In Hanlon v. Parkersburg City, Wood County Circuit Judge John D. Beane denied an emergency injunction seeking to halt the city’s sanitation and recycling privatization process. The order said the complaint relied on propositions and authorities that either did not support the claims or did not exist, including two named cases, and concluded it was perhaps entirely drafted with an AI program that hallucinated substantial caselaw.
- Why does Hanlon v. Parkersburg City matter for legal AI risk?
- This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in CC West Virginia, with the listed outcome: Request for injunctive relief dismissed.
- What does the public record establish about Hanlon v. Parkersburg City?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Hanlon v. Parkersburg City summary?
- The recorded source is wtap.com. It is classified as secondary or other linked source; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.