Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Ilan Harush v. Roee Alfasi
Magistrate's Court, Rehovot · Sep 28, 2025
IsraelEditorial impact: lowfake citationscontracttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
In Ilan Harush v. Roee Alfasi, the Rehovot Magistrate Court considered a request to transfer a fast-track monetary dispute over a website-construction project to ordinary procedure. The parties raised the filing of AI-created decisions that did not exist. The court denied the requested transfer and, despite the usual consequence of denial, ordered each side to bear its own costs in light of the citation issue.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Disallowed Costs Order; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Israeli courts now disallow costs entirely when fabricated AI cites are in the record; fees are the first line of defense.
Why this matter is tracked
In Ilan Harush v. Roee Alfasi, the Rehovot Magistrate Court considered a request to transfer a fast-track monetary dispute over a website-construction project to ordinary procedure. The parties raised the filing of AI-created decisions that did not exist. The court denied the requested transfer and, despite the usual consequence of denial, ordered each side to bear its own costs in light of the citation issue.
Operational lesson
Israeli courts now disallow costs entirely when fabricated AI cites are in the record; fees are the first line of defense.
Record details
CourtMagistrate's Court, Rehovot
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateSep 28, 2025
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeDisallowed Costs Order
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Disallowed Costs Order
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Ilan Harush v. Roee Alfasi?
- In Ilan Harush v. Roee Alfasi, the Rehovot Magistrate Court considered a request to transfer a fast-track monetary dispute over a website-construction project to ordinary procedure. The parties raised the filing of AI-created decisions that did not exist. The court denied the requested transfer and, despite the usual consequence of denial, ordered each side to bear its own costs in light of the citation issue.
- Why does Ilan Harush v. Roee Alfasi matter for legal AI risk?
- Israeli courts now disallow costs entirely when fabricated AI cites are in the record; fees are the first line of defense.
- What does the public record establish about Ilan Harush v. Roee Alfasi?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Ilan Harush v. Roee Alfasi summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.