Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
In re: Ryan Lashon Ford
W.D. North Carolina (Bankruptcy) · Jul 29, 2025
NC / federalEditorial impact: highpro sefake citationstrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Legal Norm | "When asked what law she would violate, the Debtor cited 11 U.S.C. § 541, 15 U.S.C. § 114, 17 U.S.C. §§ 504 and 505, 18 U.S.C. § 241, and the Indian Arts and Crafts Act. Of course, there is no section 114 in title 15 of the United States Code." Outcome: Contempt findings (on this and other grounds). The civil contempt were later terminated and the accrued sanctions reduced to a money judgment. See here.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Contempt findings (on this and other grounds); the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Contempt findings (on this and other grounds) in W.D. North Carolina (Bankruptcy), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Legal Norm | "When asked what law she would violate, the Debtor cited 11 U.S.C. § 541, 15 U.S.C. § 114, 17 U.S.C. §§ 504 and 505, 18 U.S.C. § 241, and the Indian Arts and Crafts Act. Of course, there is no section 114 in title 15 of the United States Code." Outcome: Contempt findings (on this and other grounds). The civil contempt were later terminated and the accrued sanctions reduced to a money judgment. See here.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Contempt findings (on this and other grounds) in W.D. North Carolina (Bankruptcy), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
North CarolinaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtW.D. North Carolina (Bankruptcy)
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit4th Circuit
DateJul 29, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeContempt findings (on this and other grounds)
Known amount$11,200
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Contempt findings (on this and other grounds)
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Legal Norm | "When asked what law she would violate, the Debtor cited 11 U.S.C. § 541, 15 U.S.C. § 114, 17 U.S.C. §§ 504 and 505, 18 U.S.C. § 241, and the Indian Arts and Crafts Act. Of course, there is no section 114 in title 15 of the United States Code."
Questions this record answers
- What happened in In re: Ryan Lashon Ford?
- Fabricated: Legal Norm | "When asked what law she would violate, the Debtor cited 11 U.S.C. § 541, 15 U.S.C. § 114, 17 U.S.C. §§ 504 and 505, 18 U.S.C. § 241, and the Indian Arts and Crafts Act. Of course, there is no section 114 in title 15 of the United States Code." Outcome: Contempt findings (on this and other grounds). The civil contempt were later terminated and the accrued sanctions reduced to a money judgment. See here.
- Why does In re: Ryan Lashon Ford matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Contempt findings (on this and other grounds) in W.D. North Carolina (Bankruptcy), making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about In re: Ryan Lashon Ford?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this In re: Ryan Lashon Ford summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.