HomeCasesJay Folse v. Governor Sproul Associates, A Pennsylvania Limited Partnership

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Jay Folse v. Governor Sproul Associates, A Pennsylvania Limited Partnership

E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 24, 2026

PA / federalEditorial impact: lowpro semisrepresented authoritycivil rightstrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Shellhammer v. Lewallen, 1 F.3d 1007, 1009–10 (10th Cir. 1993)' for a proposition; the Court found the citation confused two different cases and did not support the proposition. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether cited material supported the proposition attributed to it. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in E.D. Pennsylvania, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in E.D. Pennsylvania, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

PennsylvaniaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtE.D. Pennsylvania

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit3rd Circuit

DateJun 24, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Shellhammer v. Lewallen, 1 F.3d 1007, 1009–10 (10th Cir. 1993)' for a proposition; the Court found the citation confused two different cases and did not support the proposition.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Jay Folse v. Governor Sproul Associates, A Pennsylvania Limited Partnership?: Misrepresented: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Shellhammer v. Lewallen, 1 F.3d 1007, 1009–10 (10th Cir. 1993)' for a proposition; the Court found the citation confused two different cases and did not support the proposition. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Jay Folse v. Governor Sproul Associates, A Pennsylvania Limited Partnership matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in E.D. Pennsylvania, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Jay Folse v. Governor Sproul Associates, A Pennsylvania Limited Partnership?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Jay Folse v. Governor Sproul Associates, A Pennsylvania Limited Partnership summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Jamal Berry v. Early Warning ServicesE.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 30, 2026same court · pro se + misrepresented authority Casey A. Gaddy v. Wood Brothers Bar, Inc., et al.E.D. Pennsylvania · Jun 9, 2026same court · pro se + misrepresented authority Nydia Rosario v. Liberty Mutual Personal Insurance CompanyE.D. Pennsylvania · Feb 13, 2026same court · misrepresented authority + trial Trauger v. Columbia County District Attorney's Office et al.M.D. Pennsylvania · May 29, 2026same jurisdiction · pro se + misrepresented authority Bunce v. Visual Technology Innovations (2)E.D. Pennsylvania · Apr 20, 2026same court · misrepresented authority + trial Lifetime Well LLC v. IBSpot.com Inc.E.D. Pennsylvania · Jan 26, 2026same court · misrepresented authority + trial

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Record details

PennsylvaniaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtE.D. Pennsylvania

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit3rd Circuit

DateJun 24, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Jay Folse v. Governor Sproul Associates, A Pennsylvania Limited Partnership?

Why does Jay Folse v. Governor Sproul Associates, A Pennsylvania Limited Partnership matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Jay Folse v. Governor Sproul Associates, A Pennsylvania Limited Partnership?

Which source supports this Jay Folse v. Governor Sproul Associates, A Pennsylvania Limited Partnership summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.