AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
Search free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Nov 8, 2026 · Latest decision Nov 3, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesLawand Hill v. Foundation Media LLC
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Lawand Hill v. Foundation Media LLC

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

Cite this record

S.D. New York · Sep 22, 2026

NY / federalEditorial impact: lowiptrialNone Adjudicated
Short answer

Status: Defendant's lead counsel ordered to file a declaration on whether AI was used; no sanction; amount: no amount stated. S.D. New York, decision date on record September 22, 2026. As of November 8, 2026.

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Outcome: Defendant's lead counsel ordered to file a declaration on whether AI was used; no sanction. Following a request from the Court (available here), counsel disclosed the name of the tool (see here).

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies ip and trial and records Defendant's lead counsel ordered to file a declaration on whether AI was used; no sanction. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects ip and trial with Defendant's lead counsel ordered to file a declaration on whether AI was used; no sanction in S.D. New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Docket
1:25-cv-05947-AS-HJR (U.S. District Court, S.D. New York); Court order, Doc. 54 (filed 2026-09-22)

Why this matter is tracked

Outcome: Defendant's lead counsel ordered to file a declaration on whether AI was used; no sanction. Following a request from the Court (available here), counsel disclosed the name of the tool (see here).

Operational lesson

This matter connects ip and trial with Defendant's lead counsel ordered to file a declaration on whether AI was used; no sanction in S.D. New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

New YorkSingle-state evidence scope
Explore NYOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtS.D. New York
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit2nd Circuit
DateSep 22, 2026
First seenSep 24, 2026 (in this dataset)
AI toolHarvey
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeDefendant's lead counsel ordered to file a declaration on whether AI was used; no sanction
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo

Corrected 2026-10-24: see the corrections log.

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

Harvey is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Defendant's lead counsel ordered to file a declaration on whether AI was used; no sanction

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Lawand Hill v. Foundation Media LLC?
Outcome: Defendant's lead counsel ordered to file a declaration on whether AI was used; no sanction. Following a request from the Court (available here), counsel disclosed the name of the tool (see here).
Why does Lawand Hill v. Foundation Media LLC matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects ip and trial with Defendant's lead counsel ordered to file a declaration on whether AI was used; no sanction in S.D. New York. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Lawand Hill v. Foundation Media LLC?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Lawand Hill v. Foundation Media LLC summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Tijerino v. Spotify USA Inc.S.D. New York · Sep 29, 2026same court · ip + trialCooper v. John Doe County Court Clerk et al.S.D. New York · Oct 5, 2026same court · trialSexton v. Department of Homeless Services, et al.S.D. New York · Sep 30, 2026same court · trialTiekert v. Village of Mamaroneck, et al.S.D. New York · Sep 14, 2026same court · trialPhilippeaux v. United States, et al.S.D. New York · Sep 8, 2026same court · trialAshmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLCS.D. New York · Aug 27, 2026same court · trialSehra Waheed v. SM 1 MMS, LLC, et al.S.D. New York · Oct 28, 2025same court · trial
Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.