HomeCasesMichael Izquierdo v. Wipro Limited

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Michael Izquierdo v. Wipro Limited

N.D. Ohio · Nov 21, 2025

OH / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsemploymenttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Whelan v. Colgan Air, Inc., 2010 WL 3610460 (E.D.N.Y.)' to argue COBRA inadequacy; the Court found the case does not exist and labeled the citation likely hallucinated. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Whelan v. Colgan Air, Inc., 2010 WL 3610460 (E.D.N.Y.)' to argue COBRA inadequacy; the Court found the case does not exist and labeled the citation likely hallucinated.
Why it matters now: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in N.D. Ohio, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in N.D. Ohio, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Record details

OhioSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtN.D. Ohio

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit6th Circuit

DateNov 21, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Whelan v. Colgan Air, Inc., 2010 WL 3610460 (E.D.N.Y.)' to argue COBRA inadequacy; the Court found the case does not exist and labeled the citation likely hallucinated.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Michael Izquierdo v. Wipro Limited?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'Whelan v. Colgan Air, Inc., 2010 WL 3610460 (E.D.N.Y.)' to argue COBRA inadequacy; the Court found the case does not exist and labeled the citation likely hallucinated. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Michael Izquierdo v. Wipro Limited matter for legal AI risk?: This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in N.D. Ohio, with the listed outcome: Warning.
What does the public record establish about Michael Izquierdo v. Wipro Limited?: Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
Which source supports this Michael Izquierdo v. Wipro Limited summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Hong Chris Lu v. Capital One, N.A., et al.N.D. Ohio · Mar 25, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations Nixon v. Ken Ganley Ford WestN.D. Ohio · Sep 3, 2025same court · pro se + fake citations Burlingame v. Argo Private Client Group Ltd, et al.N.D. Ohio · Jul 8, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Vision Management Group v. Constant AviationN.D. Ohio · Sep 22, 2025same court · fake citations + trial Alkuda v. McDonald Hopkins Co., L.P.A.N.D. Ohio · Mar 18, 2025same court · pro se + trial Safe Choice, LLC v. City of ClevelandN.D. Ohio · Oct 30, 2025same court · fake citations + trial

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in N.D. Ohio, with the listed outcome: Warning.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Michael Izquierdo v. Wipro Limited?

Why does Michael Izquierdo v. Wipro Limited matter for legal AI risk?

This record documents a Pro Se Litigant filing issue in N.D. Ohio, with the listed outcome: Warning.

What does the public record establish about Michael Izquierdo v. Wipro Limited?

Which source supports this Michael Izquierdo v. Wipro Limited summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.