HomeCasesMirage v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Mirage v. Costco Wholesale Corporation

C.D. California · Jul 31, 2025

CA / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationstorttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited one or more purported cases labeled Martinez v. Ford Motor Co.; the Court was unable to find these cases, flagged possible AI use, and admonished Plaintiff for not complying with the Court's AI-disclosure Standing Order. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and tort involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in C.D. California, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and tort involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in C.D. California, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtC.D. California

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateJul 31, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited one or more purported cases labeled Martinez v. Ford Motor Co.; the Court was unable to find these cases, flagged possible AI use, and admonished Plaintiff for not complying with the Court's AI-disclosure Standing Order.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Mirage v. Costco Wholesale Corporation?: Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited one or more purported cases labeled Martinez v. Ford Motor Co.; the Court was unable to find these cases, flagged possible AI use, and admonished Plaintiff for not complying with the Court's AI-disclosure Standing Order. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Mirage v. Costco Wholesale Corporation matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and tort involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Warning in C.D. California, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Mirage v. Costco Wholesale Corporation?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Mirage v. Costco Wholesale Corporation summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

James Jordan v. USA, Clinicas Del Camino Real, Inc., et al.C.D. California · Apr 6, 2026same court · fake citations + tort Angelica E. Cruz et al. v. United States of AmericaC.D. California · Dec 16, 2025same court · fake citations + tort Strike 3 Holdings LLC v. DoeC.D. California · Jan 22, 2025same court · fake citations + tort Pedro Paulo Mansur Pagano Sampaio v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., et al.C.D. California · Jul 2, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Lagac v. Capital One, N.A.C.D. California · May 22, 2026same court · fake citations + trial Oscar Danilo Montealto Garcia v. Todd Lyons, et al.C.D. California · May 14, 2026same court · fake citations + trial

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Record details

CaliforniaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtC.D. California

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateJul 31, 2025

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Mirage v. Costco Wholesale Corporation?

Why does Mirage v. Costco Wholesale Corporation matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Mirage v. Costco Wholesale Corporation?

Which source supports this Mirage v. Costco Wholesale Corporation summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.