Nº 1001467-35.2024.5.02.0467 (ROT)
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
Labour Court 2nd District · Sep 8, 2025
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant inserted invented ementas (summaries of rulings) in the appellate brief that the court could not locate in official databases. Outcome: Monetary Fine.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fake citations and employment and records Monetary Fine. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and employment with Monetary Fine in Labour Court 2nd District. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant inserted invented ementas (summaries of rulings) in the appellate brief that the court could not locate in official databases. Outcome: Monetary Fine.
This matter connects fake citations and employment with Monetary Fine in Labour Court 2nd District. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
Corrected 2026-11-04: see the corrections log.
Amount read from the primary court record (2026-11-04): open the court record.
TRT-2 (Labour Court 2nd District) RO 1001467-35.2024.5.02.0467, 8 Sep 2025: "aplicando à reclamante multa por litigância de má-fé à razão de 5% sobre o [valor da causa]" (also headnote: "multa por litigância de má-fé à razão de 5% do valor da causa")
What the record establishes about AI use
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Monetary Fine
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant inserted invented ementas (summaries of rulings) in the appellate brief that the court could not locate in official databases.
- Fabricated: Case Law | An invented judgment attributed to a named individual who is not listed as a magistrate of the TRT da 3.ª Região.
- Fabricated: Case Law | False attributions of decisions to Ministers of the TST purportedly supporting the appellant's arguments.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Nº 1001467-35.2024.5.02.0467 (ROT)?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant inserted invented ementas (summaries of rulings) in the appellate brief that the court could not locate in official databases. Outcome: Monetary Fine.
- Why does Nº 1001467-35.2024.5.02.0467 (ROT) matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and employment with Monetary Fine in Labour Court 2nd District. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Nº 1001467-35.2024.5.02.0467 (ROT)?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Nº 1001467-35.2024.5.02.0467 (ROT) summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.