Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Nunez v. American Airlines, Inc.
S.D. Florida · Jul 24, 2025
FL / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationscontracttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case 'Doe v. Major Airline (2020)'; court confirmed the case does not exist and included it among fabricated authorities that warrant sanction. Outcome: Recom'tion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint with prejudice.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Recom'tion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint with prejudice; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Recom'tion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint with prejudice in S.D. Florida, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case 'Doe v. Major Airline (2020)'; court confirmed the case does not exist and included it among fabricated authorities that warrant sanction. Outcome: Recom'tion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint with prejudice.
Operational lesson
This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Recom'tion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint with prejudice in S.D. Florida, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
FloridaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtS.D. Florida
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit11th Circuit
DateJul 24, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeRecom'tion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint with prejudice
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Recom'tion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint with prejudice
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case 'Doe v. Major Airline (2020)'; court confirmed the case does not exist and included it among fabricated authorities that warrant sanction.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case 'Greene v. American Airlines, No. 18-CV-11459, 2019 WL 1949830 (S.D.N.Y. May 1, 2019)'; court confirmed the case does not exist and treated the citation as fabricated authority warranting sanctions.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Nunez v. American Airlines, Inc.?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited a non-existent case 'Doe v. Major Airline (2020)'; court confirmed the case does not exist and included it among fabricated authorities that warrant sanction. Outcome: Recom'tion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint with prejudice.
- Why does Nunez v. American Airlines, Inc. matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Recom'tion to dismiss plaintiff's complaint with prejudice in S.D. Florida, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Nunez v. American Airlines, Inc.?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Nunez v. American Airlines, Inc. summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.