Resolución N.º 00377-2026 / Voto N.º 2026000377
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Edward Cortes García; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
TFU San José · May 4, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Legal Norm | The appeal attributed nonexistent language to the current attorney-fee decree, including a purported family-law fee table that the Tribunal could not find in Chapter X of Decreto N.º 41457. The court held that the cited text did not exist in the applicable law and characterized it as an apparent technological hallucination. Outcome: Bar Referral.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies fake citations and bar referral and records Bar Referral. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Bar Referral in TFU San José. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Legal Norm | The appeal attributed nonexistent language to the current attorney-fee decree, including a purported family-law fee table that the Tribunal could not find in Chapter X of Decreto N.º 41457. The court held that the cited text did not exist in the applicable law and characterized it as an apparent technological hallucination. Outcome: Bar Referral.
This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Bar Referral in TFU San José. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Bar Referral
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Legal Norm | The appeal attributed nonexistent language to the current attorney-fee decree, including a purported family-law fee table that the Tribunal could not find in Chapter X of Decreto N.º 41457. The court held that the cited text did not exist in the applicable law and characterized it as an apparent technological hallucination.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Resolución N.º 00377-2026 / Voto N.º 2026000377?
- Fabricated: Legal Norm | The appeal attributed nonexistent language to the current attorney-fee decree, including a purported family-law fee table that the Tribunal could not find in Chapter X of Decreto N.º 41457. The court held that the cited text did not exist in the applicable law and characterized it as an apparent technological hallucination. Outcome: Bar Referral.
- Why does Resolución N.º 00377-2026 / Voto N.º 2026000377 matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects fake citations and bar referral with Bar Referral in TFU San José. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Resolución N.º 00377-2026 / Voto N.º 2026000377?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Resolución N.º 00377-2026 / Voto N.º 2026000377 summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.