HomeCasesYanling Zhang v. Yanhui Zhang

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Yanling Zhang v. Yanhui Zhang

SC Nevada · Apr 22, 2026

NV / stateEditorial impact: highfake citationsmisrepresented authoritybar referralfamily

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited City of Henderson v. Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council, but the Court's research indicates this citation is fictional. Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral; Refusal to file corrected brief. Order to Show Cause is here.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Monetary Fine; Bar Referral; Refusal to file corrected brief; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral; Refusal to file corrected brief in SC Nevada, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral; Refusal to file corrected brief in SC Nevada, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

NevadaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtSC Nevada

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit9th Circuit

DateApr 22, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeMonetary Fine; Bar Referral; Refusal to file corrected brief

Known amount$250

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Monetary Fine; Bar Referral; Refusal to file corrected brief

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited City of Henderson v. Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council, but the Court's research indicates this citation is fictional.
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited Blakeney v. State, but the Court's research indicates this citation is fictional.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited Certified Fire Prot., Inc. v. Precision Constr., Inc.; the Court found the real case does not support the legal proposition for which it was cited.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited Coyote Springs Inv. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Ct.; the Court found the real case does not support the legal proposition for which it was cited.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Yanling Zhang v. Yanhui Zhang?: Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited City of Henderson v. Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council, but the Court's research indicates this citation is fictional. Outcome: Monetary Fine; Bar Referral; Refusal to file corrected brief. Order to Show Cause is here.
Why does Yanling Zhang v. Yanhui Zhang matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and misrepresented authority involving AI (implied, unspecified) with Monetary Fine; Bar Referral; Refusal to file corrected brief in SC Nevada, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Yanling Zhang v. Yanhui Zhang?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Yanling Zhang v. Yanhui Zhang summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Smith v. Eighth Judicial District Court in and for County of ClarkSC Nevada · Jan 13, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority In re the Marriage of Amy Haddock and Justin Blu HaddockDC Oklahoma · May 21, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Seeto v. KendallD. Nevada · May 5, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + misrepresented authority Wendy Wolkenstein and Rebecca Knepp v. Dan Heinrich and Samual TilleryD. Nevada · Apr 6, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + misrepresented authority Edward C. Allen v. Western Governors University, et al.D. Nevada · Mar 31, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + misrepresented authority Prososki v. ReganSC Nebraska · Mar 20, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Record details

NevadaSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtSC Nevada

Jurisdictionstate

Circuit9th Circuit

DateApr 22, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeMonetary Fine; Bar Referral; Refusal to file corrected brief

Known amount$250

Professional sanctionNo

Tracked discrepancy record

4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited City of Henderson v. Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council, but the Court's research indicates this citation is fictional.

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited Blakeney v. State, but the Court's research indicates this citation is fictional.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited Certified Fire Prot., Inc. v. Precision Constr., Inc.; the Court found the real case does not support the legal proposition for which it was cited.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited Coyote Springs Inv. v. Eighth Judicial Dist. Ct.; the Court found the real case does not support the legal proposition for which it was cited.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Yanling Zhang v. Yanhui Zhang?

Why does Yanling Zhang v. Yanhui Zhang matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Yanling Zhang v. Yanhui Zhang?

Which source supports this Yanling Zhang v. Yanhui Zhang summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.