Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Sonkin v. Roll Profile Ltd
Haifa Labour Court · Sep 29, 2025
IsraelEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsemploymenttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
In Sonkin v. Roll Profile Ltd., the Haifa Labor Court addressed counsel’s explanation that medical circumstances had led to AI use in preparing the claim. The original pleading cited twenty cases that did not exist, and counsel did not acknowledge the problem until after a court order. Finding the lapse serious and burdensome to the defense, the court ordered NIS 2,000 in costs regardless of the eventual merits result.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Monetary Fine; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Twenty fabricated citations draw four-figure fines in Israeli labour courts; volume of errors directly scales penalty.
Why this matter is tracked
In Sonkin v. Roll Profile Ltd., the Haifa Labor Court addressed counsel’s explanation that medical circumstances had led to AI use in preparing the claim. The original pleading cited twenty cases that did not exist, and counsel did not acknowledge the problem until after a court order. Finding the lapse serious and burdensome to the defense, the court ordered NIS 2,000 in costs regardless of the eventual merits result.
Operational lesson
Twenty fabricated citations draw four-figure fines in Israeli labour courts; volume of errors directly scales penalty.
Record details
CourtHaifa Labour Court
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateSep 29, 2025
AI
AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeMonetary Fine
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Monetary Fine
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Twenty fabricated citations
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Sonkin v. Roll Profile Ltd?
- In Sonkin v. Roll Profile Ltd., the Haifa Labor Court addressed counsel’s explanation that medical circumstances had led to AI use in preparing the claim. The original pleading cited twenty cases that did not exist, and counsel did not acknowledge the problem until after a court order. Finding the lapse serious and burdensome to the defense, the court ordered NIS 2,000 in costs regardless of the eventual merits result.
- Why does Sonkin v. Roll Profile Ltd matter for legal AI risk?
- Twenty fabricated citations draw four-figure fines in Israeli labour courts; volume of errors directly scales penalty.
- What does the public record establish about Sonkin v. Roll Profile Ltd?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Sonkin v. Roll Profile Ltd summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.