Public trackerCorpus refreshed Nov 3, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 29, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Home/Cases
Complete corpus

Search legal AI risk records

Find cases, orders, courts, tools, and failure patterns. Results cover the complete global corpus; use status filters to separate allegation-only records. Judge search is available only where a judge is recorded.

Geographic scope: 2,257 public matters across the global corpus.Clear all filters

403 matching matters

Showing 401-403 · Page 17 of 17

Download these 403 results (CSV)

Public matterCourt / jurisdictionDateRecorded AI toolAmountImpact
Smith v. Farwellfake citations · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewMassachusettsMA · stateFeb 12, 2024Unidentified$2.0KmediumMata v. Avianca, Incfake citations · fabricated quotes · misrepresented authorityIncluded in the selected corpus viewS.D. New YorkNY · federalJun 22, 2023ChatGPT$5.0KmediumNº 0600814-85.2022.6.00.0000fake citations · administrative · trialIncluded in the selected corpus viewTribunal Superior EleitoralBrazil · internationalApr 14, 2023ChatGPT—medium
Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.

Data cut: corpus refreshed Nov 3, 2026, 2,257 public records.

Cite this page

Bluebook

AI Vortex, Search AI hallucination cases, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Nov. 3, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (last visited Nov. 3, 2026).

APA

AI Vortex. (2026, November 3). Search AI hallucination cases. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved November 3, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases

URL

https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/cases (accessed 2026-11-03)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.

Before the next filing goes out, review the workflow behind it.

These records show where AI-assisted filings went wrong. AI Vortex works with law firms and legal teams on one AI-assisted workflow at a time: who reviews the output, who signs, and what source trail it leaves. Operations design, not legal advice.

Review a workflow