Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
COURT EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-17747YZGenerated September 13, 2026Evidence checked Sep 12, 2026
COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

CA Michigan

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records7
Source linked85.7%
Known amount totalNone recorded
Recorded rangeDec 19, 2025 Aug 28, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in CA Michigan?

AI Vortex currently links 7 source-linked public matters associated with CA Michigan. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (4), Misrepresented authority (3) and Fabricated or altered quotations (2). Recorded responses and outcomes include No adjudicated consequence recorded (4), Bar or professional referral (1) and Dismissal or adverse disposition (1). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 7 of 7
Aug 28, 2026Estate of Bernie Leynell Nelson v Hurley Medical CenterCA MichiganAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jul 9, 2026Michigan MM, Inc. v. Alea PropertiesCA MichiganAI (implied, unspecified)Source pending
Jun 17, 2026Joyce Barber v. Lawrence J. Morawa, MDCA MichiganUnidentifiedSource
Jun 11, 2026CH v BDCA MichiganAI (implied, unspecified)Source
May 5, 2026Barber v. MorawaCA MichiganClaude, ChatGPT, Westlaw, LexisSource
Apr 30, 2026Eagle Township v. Shaun VanAlstineCA MichiganAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Dec 19, 2025Groulx v. CSL LimitedCA MichiganUnidentifiedSource
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.