COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

CA Oregon

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records8

Source linked100%

Known USD amount total$21,394

Recorded rangeDec 3, 2025 – Sep 23, 2026

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in CA Oregon?

AI Vortex currently links 8 source-linked public matters associated with CA Oregon. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (8), Misrepresented authority (5) and Fabricated or altered quotations (4). Recorded responses and outcomes include Monetary sanction (7), Filing or pleading struck (3) and Dismissal or adverse disposition (1). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.

OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Fabricated authorities8 · 100%Misrepresented authority5 · 62.5%Fabricated or altered quotations4 · 50%

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.

RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

Monetary sanction7 · 87.5%Filing or pleading struck3 · 37.5%Dismissal or adverse disposition1 · 12.5%

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

Pro Se Litigant5 · 62.5%Lawyer3 · 37.5%

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

Administrative2 · 25%Tort2 · 25%Contract1 · 12.5%Criminal1 · 12.5%Family1 · 12.5%

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 8 of 8

Sep 23, 2026R. M. v. MohrCA OregonUnidentifiedSource

Jul 15, 2026State v. DixonCA OregonNo tool named in sourceSource

May 6, 2026Boersma v. DavenportCA OregonNo tool named in sourceSource

Apr 22, 2026Carol L. Williams v. Tracy HonlCA OregonUnidentifiedSource

Apr 6, 2026Kelly Bartholomew v. Public Utility Commission of OregonCA OregonUnidentifiedSource

Mar 18, 2026Doiban v. Oregon Liquor and Cannabis CommissionCA OregonUnidentifiedSource

Feb 11, 2026Keith Powell v. Employment Dep. & First Congregational Church of PortlandCA OregonUnidentifiedSource

Dec 3, 2025Ringo v. Colquhoun Design Studio, LLCCA OregonAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Open all matching records

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE

Related corpus profiles

Fake Citations8 shared records United States8 shared records Oregon8 shared records Monetary7 shared records Misrepresented Authority5 shared records Fabricated Quotes4 shared records

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, CA Oregon Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 27, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/ca-oregon/report (last visited Oct. 27, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, October 27). CA Oregon Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 27, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/ca-oregon/report
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/ca-oregon/report (accessed 2026-10-27)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.