COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

E.D. New York

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records15

Source linked100%

Known USD amount total$3,500

Recorded rangeApr 24, 2025 – Oct 2, 2026

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in E.D. New York?

AI Vortex currently links 15 source-linked public matters associated with E.D. New York. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (12), Fabricated or altered quotations (6) and Misrepresented authority (3). Recorded responses and outcomes include No adjudicated consequence recorded (5), Warning or admonishment (5) and Monetary sanction (4). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.

OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Fabricated authorities12 · 80%Fabricated or altered quotations6 · 40%Misrepresented authority3 · 20%

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.

RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

No adjudicated consequence recorded5 · 33.3%Warning or admonishment5 · 33.3%Monetary sanction4 · 26.7%Bar or professional referral1 · 6.7%Professional discipline1 · 6.7%

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

Lawyer9 · 60%Pro Se Litigant5 · 33.3%Paralegal1 · 6.7%

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

Contract5 · 33.3%Employment2 · 13.3%Other2 · 13.3%Civil Rights1 · 6.7%Immigration1 · 6.7%

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 15

Oct 2, 2026Mercante v. TarziaE.D. New YorkWestlaw AISource

Sep 30, 2026Nantongo v. Nationwide Mortgage Bankers Inc.E.D. New YorkNo tool named in sourceSource

Sep 14, 2026Henry v. Long Island UniversityE.D. New YorkNo tool named in sourceSource

Jun 4, 2026Owens v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.E.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source

May 27, 2026Polanco v. Himalayan Real Estate LLC, et al.E.D. New YorkNo tool named in sourceSource

May 13, 2026Henri Giovani Morales Jimenez v. Christopher ShanahanE.D. New YorkNo tool named in sourceSource

May 6, 2026Terrance Anthony Norris v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.E.D. New YorkUnidentifiedSource

Apr 30, 2026Superb Motors Inc. et al. v. Anthony Deo et al.E.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Mar 31, 2026Evgeny Yaroshevsky v. Karlin et al.E.D. New YorkGeminiSource

Feb 3, 20261S REO Opportunity 1, LLC v. 223 Howard LLCE.D. New YorkNo tool named in sourceSource

Dec 3, 2025Farrow v. John DoesE.D. New YorkNo tool named in sourceSource

Aug 7, 2025Hall v. The Academy Charter SchoolE.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Open all matching records

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE

Related corpus profiles

United States15 shared records New York15 shared records Fake Citations12 shared records Fabricated Quotes6 shared records None Adjudicated5 shared records Warning5 shared records

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, E.D. New York Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 27, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/e-d-new-york/report (last visited Oct. 27, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, October 27). E.D. New York Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 27, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/e-d-new-york/report
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/e-d-new-york/report (accessed 2026-10-27)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.