Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
COURT EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-1N3BLJPGenerated September 12, 2026Evidence checked Sep 11, 2026
COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

E.D. New York

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records12
Source linked100%
Known amount total$3,500
Recorded rangeApr 24, 2025 Jun 4, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in E.D. New York?

AI Vortex currently links 12 source-linked public matters associated with E.D. New York. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (9), Fabricated or altered quotations (4) and Misrepresented authority (1). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (6), Monetary sanction (5) and No adjudicated consequence recorded (2). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 12
Jun 4, 2026Owens v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.E.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
May 27, 2026Polanco v. Himalayan Real Estate LLC, et al.E.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
May 13, 2026Henri Giovani Morales Jimenez v. Christopher ShanahanE.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
May 6, 2026Terrance Anthony Norris v. JPMorgan Chase Bank N.A.E.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Apr 30, 2026Superb Motors Inc. et al. v. Anthony Deo et al.E.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Mar 31, 2026Evgeny Yaroshevsky v. Karlin et al.E.D. New YorkGeminiSource
Feb 3, 20261S REO Opportunity 1, LLC v. 223 Howard LLCE.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Dec 3, 2025Farrow v. John DoesE.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Aug 7, 2025Hall v. The Academy Charter SchoolE.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jun 13, 2025Taylor v. Cooper Power & Lighting Corp.E.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
May 13, 2025Ramirez v. HumalaE.D. New YorkUnidentifiedSource
Apr 24, 2025Benjamin v. Costco Wholesale CorpE.D. New YorkChatOnSource
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.