COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

Federal Circuit and Family Court

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records9

Source linked100%

Known USD amount totalNone recorded

Recorded rangeAug 15, 2025 – Sep 14, 2026

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in Federal Circuit and Family Court?

AI Vortex currently links 9 source-linked public matters associated with Federal Circuit and Family Court. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (8), Misrepresented authority (4) and Fabricated or altered quotations (2). Recorded responses and outcomes include Monetary sanction (3), Bar or professional referral (2) and No adjudicated consequence recorded (2). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.

OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Fabricated authorities8 · 88.9%Misrepresented authority4 · 44.4%Fabricated or altered quotations2 · 22.2%

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.

RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

Monetary sanction3 · 33.3%Bar or professional referral2 · 22.2%No adjudicated consequence recorded2 · 22.2%Professional discipline2 · 22.2%Warning or admonishment2 · 22.2%Dismissal or adverse disposition1 · 11.1%

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

Pro Se Litigant5 · 55.6%Lawyer4 · 44.4%

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

Administrative3 · 33.3%Family3 · 33.3%Bankruptcy1 · 11.1%Immigration1 · 11.1%

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 9 of 9

Sep 14, 2026Dey v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 2)Federal Circuit and Family CourtUnidentifiedSource

Mar 19, 2026Jenson & Lockridge (No 2)Federal Circuit and Family CourtUnidentifiedSource

Mar 5, 2026ELG20 v Minister for Immigration and CitizenshipFederal Circuit and Family CourtChatGPT; OpenAISource

Feb 3, 2026Pasuengos v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 2)Federal Circuit and Family CourtGoogle search AI summarySource

Jan 16, 2026Lutfi v. TuckerFederal Circuit and Family CourtUnidentifiedSource

Dec 23, 2025Tekla & TeklaFederal Circuit and Family CourtNo tool named in sourceSource

Dec 22, 2025Pasuengos v Minister for Immigration and CitizenshipFederal Circuit and Family CourtUnidentifiedSource

Dec 22, 2025Rathi & RathiFederal Circuit and Family CourtAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Aug 15, 2025JNE24 v Minister for Immigration and CitizenshipFederal Circuit and Family CourtClaude AI, Microsoft CopilotSource

Open all matching records

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE

Related corpus profiles

Australia9 shared records Fake Citations8 shared records Misrepresented Authority4 shared records Monetary3 shared records None Adjudicated2 shared records Fabricated Quotes2 shared records

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, Federal Circuit and Family Court Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 26, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/federal-circuit-and-family-court/report (last visited Oct. 26, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, October 26). Federal Circuit and Family Court Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 26, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/federal-circuit-and-family-court/report
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/federal-circuit-and-family-court/report (accessed 2026-10-26)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.