Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Pasuengos v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship
Federal Circuit and Family Court · Dec 22, 2025
AustraliaEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsadministrativeappellate
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant's written submissions cited multiple authorities that, on request, could not be produced because they do not exist; Minister alerted the Court to the non-existence. Outcome: Order to Show Cause. The court eventually granted some costs in a subsequent decision (see here).
- Why the court cared
- Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant's written submissions cited multiple authorities that, on request, could not be produced because they do not exist; Minister alerted the Court to the non-existence.
- Why it matters now
- Opposing counsel will check your authorities; a show-cause order is the inevitable next step when citations do not exist.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant's written submissions cited multiple authorities that, on request, could not be produced because they do not exist; Minister alerted the Court to the non-existence. Outcome: Order to Show Cause. The court eventually granted some costs in a subsequent decision (see here).
Operational lesson
Opposing counsel will check your authorities; a show-cause order is the inevitable next step when citations do not exist.
Record details
CourtFederal Circuit and Family Court
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateDec 22, 2025
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeOrder to Show Cause
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Order to Show Cause
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant's written submissions cited multiple authorities that, on request, could not be produced because they do not exist; Minister alerted the Court to the non-existence.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Pasuengos v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Applicant's written submissions cited multiple authorities that, on request, could not be produced because they do not exist; Minister alerted the Court to the non-existence. Outcome: Order to Show Cause. The court eventually granted some costs in a subsequent decision (see here).
- Why does Pasuengos v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship matter for legal AI risk?
- Opposing counsel will check your authorities; a show-cause order is the inevitable next step when citations do not exist.
- What does the public record establish about Pasuengos v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship?
- Retained unchanged after audit: the existing summary is source-specific, non-placeholder, and supported by the recorded source link. Read the underlying source before relying on it for legal advice or a filing.
- Which source supports this Pasuengos v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.