Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
COURT EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-1P11LKTGenerated September 12, 2026Evidence checked Sep 12, 2026
COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

N.D. Texas

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records14
Source linked100%
Known amount total$611
Recorded rangeMar 6, 2024 Aug 27, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in N.D. Texas?

AI Vortex currently links 14 source-linked public matters associated with N.D. Texas. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (12), Fabricated or altered quotations (4) and Misrepresented authority (3). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (9), Monetary sanction (2) and No adjudicated consequence recorded (2). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 14
Jul 22, 2026Pamon v. United States Postal Service et alN.D. TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jun 23, 2026Rodney Herod v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.N.D. TexasUnidentifiedSource
Mar 12, 2026Hartmann v. DavidsonN.D. TexasUnidentifiedSource
Feb 23, 2026Shawn Olali v. Ampex Brands, LLCN.D. TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jan 9, 2026Garibay-Robledo v. NoemN.D. TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Dec 30, 2025Johnson v. Digital Federal Credit UnionN.D. TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Dec 23, 2025Allen v. AmazonN.D. TexasUnidentifiedSource
Nov 10, 2025Shelton v. Parkland HealthN.D. TexasUnidentifiedSource
Oct 29, 2025Joy Wilson v. KIPP Texas, Inc.N.D. TexasChatGPTSource
Oct 27, 2025Jayroe v. Progressive Casualty Insurance CompanyN.D. TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.