COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

N.D. Texas

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records15

Source linked100%

Known USD amount totalNone recorded

Recorded rangeMar 6, 2024 – Aug 27, 2026

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in N.D. Texas?

AI Vortex currently links 15 source-linked public matters associated with N.D. Texas. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (13), Fabricated or altered quotations (5) and Misrepresented authority (3). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (10), No adjudicated consequence recorded (3) and Dismissal or adverse disposition (1). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.

OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Fabricated authorities13 · 86.7%Fabricated or altered quotations5 · 33.3%Misrepresented authority3 · 20%

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.

RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

Warning or admonishment10 · 66.7%No adjudicated consequence recorded3 · 20%Dismissal or adverse disposition1 · 6.7%Monetary sanction1 · 6.7%Non-monetary order (CLE, community service, apology)1 · 6.7%

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

Pro Se Litigant8 · 53.3%Lawyer7 · 46.7%

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

Contract3 · 20%Employment3 · 20%Other3 · 20%Administrative2 · 13.3%Civil Rights1 · 6.7%

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 15

Aug 27, 2026Peter Williams, et al. v. Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport Board, et al.N.D. TexasNo tool named in sourceSource

Aug 18, 2026Imperial Reliance, LLC v. HZ Properties & Marketing, LLCN.D. TexasWestlaw generative AI / premium Westlaw subscriptionSource

Jul 28, 2026Transcontinental Realty Investors, Inc., et al. v. Daniel J. MoosN.D. TexasNo tool named in sourceSource

Jul 22, 2026Pamon v. United States Postal Service et alN.D. TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jun 23, 2026Rodney Herod v. Hobby Lobby Stores, Inc.N.D. TexasUnidentifiedSource

Mar 12, 2026Hartmann v. DavidsonN.D. TexasUnidentifiedSource

Feb 23, 2026Shawn Olali v. Ampex Brands, LLCN.D. TexasNo tool named in sourceSource

Jan 9, 2026Garibay-Robledo v. NoemN.D. TexasUnidentifiedSource

Dec 30, 2025Johnson v. Digital Federal Credit UnionN.D. TexasNo tool named in sourceSource

Dec 23, 2025Allen v. AmazonN.D. TexasUnidentifiedSource

Nov 10, 2025Shelton v. Parkland HealthN.D. TexasUnidentifiedSource

Oct 29, 2025Joy Wilson v. KIPP Texas, Inc.N.D. TexasChatGPTSource

Open all matching records

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE

Related corpus profiles

United States15 shared records Texas15 shared records Fake Citations13 shared records Warning10 shared records Fabricated Quotes5 shared records Misrepresented Authority3 shared records

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, N.D. Texas Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 27, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/n-d-texas/report (last visited Oct. 27, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, October 27). N.D. Texas Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 27, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/n-d-texas/report
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/n-d-texas/report (accessed 2026-10-27)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.