COURT EVIDENCE REPORT

W.D. Texas

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records12

Source linked100%

Known USD amount total$3,961

Recorded rangeJan 29, 2025 – Aug 18, 2026

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What kinds of legal AI issues and responses appear in W.D. Texas?

AI Vortex currently links 12 source-linked public matters associated with W.D. Texas. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (10), Misrepresented authority (6) and Fabricated or altered quotations (5). Recorded responses and outcomes include No adjudicated consequence recorded (5), Warning or admonishment (3) and Dismissal or adverse disposition (1). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the court.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.

OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Fabricated authorities10 · 83.3%Misrepresented authority6 · 50%Fabricated or altered quotations5 · 41.7%

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.

RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

No adjudicated consequence recorded5 · 41.7%Warning or admonishment3 · 25%Dismissal or adverse disposition1 · 8.3%Filing or pleading struck1 · 8.3%Monetary sanction1 · 8.3%Order to show cause1 · 8.3%

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

Lawyer7 · 58.3%Pro Se Litigant5 · 41.7%

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

Employment4 · 33.3%Other3 · 25%Habeas2 · 16.7%Civil Rights1 · 8.3%IP1 · 8.3%

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 12

Aug 18, 2026Gilberto Garcia Perez v. Todd Blanche, et al.W.D. TexasNo tool named in sourceSource

Aug 5, 2026Jennifer Lynn Cain v. Hyatt CorporationW.D. TexasNo tool named in sourceSource

Aug 3, 2026Moore v. Aldridge Pite LLPW.D. TexasNo tool named in sourceSource

Jun 30, 2026Rene Carbonell v. United States of AmericaW.D. TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Feb 26, 2026David Thomas v. The Quikrete Companies, LLCW.D. TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Feb 4, 2026Ericka Holmes v. The University of Texas at AustinW.D. TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jan 20, 2026Yue v. Reaction Labs, LLCW.D. TexasNo tool named in sourceSource

Dec 6, 2025Thomas Duncan v. Gridhawk et al.W.D. TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Oct 1, 2025Gavin B. Davis v. Chief Officer Gina Faubion, et al.W.D. TexasUnidentifiedSource

Sep 4, 2025Jason Stanford v. Behrooz P. Vida, et al.W.D. TexasUnidentifiedSource

Aug 28, 2025Thackston v. DriscollW.D. TexasAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jan 29, 2025Gonzalez v. Texas Taxpayers and Research AssociationW.D. TexasLexis Nexis's AISource

Open all matching records

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE

Related corpus profiles

United States12 shared records Texas12 shared records Fake Citations10 shared records Misrepresented Authority6 shared records None Adjudicated5 shared records Fabricated Quotes5 shared records

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, W.D. Texas Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 27, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/w-d-texas/report (last visited Oct. 27, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, October 27). W.D. Texas Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 27, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/w-d-texas/report
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/courts/w-d-texas/report (accessed 2026-10-27)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.