Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
ISSUE SIGNAL REPORTAV-ER-0JTSGA5Generated October 27, 2026Evidence checked Oct 27, 2026
ISSUE SIGNAL REPORT

Misrepresented Authority

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records960
Source linked99.6%
Known USD amount total$1,230,958.23
Recorded rangeJun 14, 2023 – Oct 22, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

Where does Misrepresented Authority appear and what responses are recorded?

Taxonomy definition: Existing authority recorded as used for a proposition, jurisdiction, or rule it does not support.

AI Vortex currently links 960 source-linked public matters classified with Misrepresented Authority. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Misrepresented authority (960), Fabricated authorities (783) and Fabricated or altered quotations (407). Recorded responses and outcomes include No adjudicated consequence recorded (308), Warning or admonishment (275) and Monetary sanction (219). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the failure.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 960
Oct 22, 2026Ocean Wave Drywall Ltd. v. JohalBC CRTNo tool named in sourceSource
Oct 21, 2026Moore v. Jackson Walker LLP, et al.S.D. TexasNo tool named in sourceSource
Oct 21, 2026U.S. Department of Health and Human Services and National Treasury Employees Union, 74 FLRA No. 87Federal Labor Relations AuthorityAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Oct 19, 2026Commonwealth v. ButlerSC PennsylvaniaNo tool named in sourceSource
Oct 15, 2026Waushara County v. Beatrice BruningCA WisconsinNo tool named in sourceSource
Oct 14, 2026Davis v. Tressler and YorkCA IndianaNo tool named in sourceSource
Oct 14, 2026Sabatini v. Pennsylvania Public Utility CommissionC. PennsylvaniaNo tool named in sourceSource
Oct 13, 2026Thornton v. Amazon.com Services LLCE.D. CaliforniaNo tool named in sourceSource
Oct 8, 2026Avargil et al. v. Yaakov et al.MC Nof HaGalil-NazarethUnidentifiedSource
Oct 8, 2026In the Matter of Gary Brown, Jr.AC MarylandNo tool named in sourceSource
Oct 7, 2026Butler v. The Travelers Indemnity CompanySC ConnecticutNo tool named in sourceSource
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

Cite this page

Bluebook

AI Vortex, Misrepresented Authority Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 27, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/failure-modes/misrepresented-authority/report (last visited Oct. 27, 2026).

APA

AI Vortex. (2026, October 27). Misrepresented Authority Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 27, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/failure-modes/misrepresented-authority/report

URL

https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/failure-modes/misrepresented-authority/report (accessed 2026-10-27)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.