Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 26, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 23, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesJohnny Tyson II v. Warren Inn Haltom City Ltd. d/b/a Acacia Apartments
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 80/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Johnny Tyson II v. Warren Inn Haltom City Ltd. d/b/a Acacia Apartments

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

CA Texas (2d) · Oct 22, 2026

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Misrepresented: Case Law | Tyson characterized McEwen as holding that a state court lacks jurisdiction to render judgment after removal and that such judgment is void. The court explained that McEwen actually held that appeal by writ of error or bill of review were the exclusive methods for setting aside the default judgment and that the trial court’s order vacating it was void.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in CA Texas (2d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Misrepresented: Case Law | Tyson characterized McEwen as holding that a state court lacks jurisdiction to render judgment after removal and that such judgment is void. The court explained that McEwen actually held that appeal by writ of error or bill of review were the exclusive methods for setting aside the default judgment and that the trial court’s order vacating it was void.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in CA Texas (2d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

TexasSingle-state evidence scope
Explore TXOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtCA Texas (2d)
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit5th Circuit
DateOct 22, 2026
NO
AI toolNo tool named in source
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

7 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Misrepresented: Case Law | Tyson characterized McEwen as holding that a state court lacks jurisdiction to render judgment after removal and that such judgment is void. The court explained that McEwen actually held that appeal by writ of error or bill of review were the exclusive methods for setting aside the default judgment and that the trial court’s order vacating it was void.
  2. Misrepresented: Case Law | Tyson characterized Hampton as holding that same-day removal and state-court proceedings are governed by which event occurred first based on objective timestamps. The court explained that Hampton involved different filing circumstances and held that the federal removal requirements had not been met; it did not establish Tyson’s stated rule.
  3. False Quotes: Case Law | Tyson quoted Blanco as stating that failure to give required notice constitutes lack of due process and grounds for reversal, but the quoted language does not appear in the case.
  4. Fabricated: Case Law | Tyson cited Bell Helicopter Textron, Inc. v. Agusta S.p.A., but the court found that the case is fictitious; the cited reporter volume and page instead refer to Motsenbocker v. Potts.
  5. Misrepresented: Case Law | Tyson cited Cook for the proposition that a void judgment may be challenged at any time in any court regardless of the proceeding’s scope. The court explained that Cook stated only that a void judgment may be collaterally attacked and did not support Tyson’s broader proposition.
  6. Misrepresented: Case Law | Tyson relied on Lopez for the proposition that failure to receive proper notice automatically warrants a new trial without further analysis. The court explained that Lopez concerned a defendant with no actual or constructive notice and did not support Tyson’s argument because Tyson had notice of the trial setting.
  7. Misrepresented: Case Law | Tyson cited Wyatt for the proposition that a plea in abatement must be decided before the court proceeds to the merits. The court explained that Wyatt concerned dominant jurisdiction between courts in different counties and did not establish the proposition asserted.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Johnny Tyson II v. Warren Inn Haltom City Ltd. d/b/a Acacia Apartments?
Misrepresented: Case Law | Tyson characterized McEwen as holding that a state court lacks jurisdiction to render judgment after removal and that such judgment is void. The court explained that McEwen actually held that appeal by writ of error or bill of review were the exclusive methods for setting aside the default judgment and that the trial court’s order vacating it was void.
Why does Johnny Tyson II v. Warren Inn Haltom City Ltd. d/b/a Acacia Apartments matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in CA Texas (2d). It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Johnny Tyson II v. Warren Inn Haltom City Ltd. d/b/a Acacia Apartments?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Johnny Tyson II v. Warren Inn Haltom City Ltd. d/b/a Acacia Apartments summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

This record involves a self-represented party. See all pro se litigant AI hallucination decisions in the corpus, with counts by year, country and outcome.

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.