Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 27, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 23, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Source-linked corpus view

Professional

Professional appears in 168 of 2,223 public corpus records (7.6%). This page describes the recorded dataset, not an incidence rate, prevalence of AI use, or a prediction of future outcomes.

Matched records168
Corpus denominator2,223
Source linked98.8%
Latest trackedSep 25, 2026
Evidence-based answer

What issues appear in matters recording Professional?

Taxonomy definition: A practice-related response such as discipline, suspension, referral, or another professional measure is recorded.

AI Vortex currently links 168 source-linked public matters that record Professional. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (152), Misrepresented authority (92) and Fabricated or altered quotations (87). Recorded responses and outcomes include Professional discipline (168), Bar or professional referral (108) and Monetary sanction (104). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the consequence.

Every count below links to the exact matching records. The linked source, subsequent docket history, and local procedural context remain controlling.

Leading issue signalFabricated authorities152 records
Leading recorded responseProfessional discipline168 records
Known USD amounts$708,789.8072 known · 32 unquantified
Recorded date rangeNov 21, 2023through Sep 25, 2026
Observed issue mix

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within a single matter.

Recorded consequences

How did courts or authorities respond?

Response categories can overlap and do not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

Participant context

Who appears in these matters?

Matter context

Which practice areas are represented?

Attribution status

How is AI involvement recorded?

Unspecified attribution is not evidence that a particular vendor was used.

Corpus evolution

When were these matters recorded?

Public records in this view

Showing the most recent 24 of 168 matching records.

Aguilar v. The Crawford Group, Inc.D. Massachusetts · MA · Unidentified
Sep 25, 2026
Dey v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship (No 2)Federal Circuit and Family Court · Australia · Unidentified
Sep 14, 2026
Henry v. Long Island UniversityE.D. New York · NY · No tool named in source
Sep 14, 2026
Virgil v. Experian Information Solutions, et al.S.D. Indiana · IN · No tool named in source
Sep 11, 2026
Registered Trustees of the Assemblies of God Gospel Church International (AGGCI) v Registrar of Societies and OthersHigh Court · Tanzania · No tool named in source
Sep 3, 2026
Morgan Cole v. Hobby Town Unlimited, Inc.C.D. Illinois · IL · No tool named in source
Sep 2, 2026
Varma v. The Bank of New York MellonCA California (4d) · CA · Unidentified
Aug 27, 2026
Solicitors Regulation Authority Ltd v Abhishek KumarSolicitors Disciplinary Tribunal · GB · Unidentified
Aug 25, 2026
Michael L. Ruiz v. Magellan Financial & Insurance Services (2)D. Arizona · AZ · ChatGPT
Aug 24, 2026
Capital Standard, LLC v. U.S. Bank National AssociationCA Florida (2d) · FL · Unidentified
Aug 21, 2026
Unspecified murder appeal (Las Cruces area)New Mexico SC · NM · ChatGPT
Aug 21, 2026
Garry Chapman v. City of Priceville, et al.N.D. Alabama · AL · No tool named in source
Aug 12, 2026
JMOR Properties v. Artist Alley Townhomes et al.CA Florida (4d) · FL · Unidentified
Aug 12, 2026
In re BFI Waste Sys. of Tenn.M.D. Tennessee · TN · Unidentified
Aug 6, 2026
Southland Homes & Real Estate and Investment, LLC v. LamSC California · CA · ChatGPT and Google Gemini
Aug 5, 2026
Barteca Holdings v. TacobarnD. Connecticut · CT · Open Law; Claude; ChatGPT
Aug 4, 2026
Kleyman Law Group, P.C. v. KaloidisSC New York · NY · Claude and other generative AI platforms
Aug 4, 2026
Damon Forney v. Township of Cary, North CarolinaE.D. North Carolina · NC · No tool named in source
Aug 3, 2026
TOV Realty, LLC v. Suarez; Kosel Equity, LLC v. MacGregorSC Connecticut · CT · ChatGPT
Jul 31, 2026
Scott v. Illinois Human Rights Comm’nCA Illinois · IL · ChatGPT
Jul 28, 2026
Beslissing in de zaak 26-379/DB/LI/DRaad van Discipline · Netherlands · Unidentified
Jul 27, 2026
In the Matter of Brian E. MitchellUSPTO · US · Unidentified
Jul 27, 2026
N°0035599-44.2017.8.16.0014TJ Parana · Brazil · No tool named in source
Jul 22, 2026
In re Rosslyn2016, LLC, et al.S.D. Texas (Bankruptcy) · TX · Westlaw Precision
Jul 14, 2026
Open the full analytics view

Scope and limitation

This page groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish a judge’s general practices or sanction rate. For every entity type, the view is not a comparison against unobserved proceedings.

Indexing and evidence status

This public entity profile is indexable and meets the evidence-depth baseline of at least 3 source-linked records.