AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 27, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 23, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesOcean Wave Drywall Ltd. v. Johal
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 80/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Ocean Wave Drywall Ltd. v. Johal

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Courtready; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

BC CRT · Oct 22, 2026

CanadaEditorial impact: lowpro semisrepresented authoritycontracttrialNone Adjudicated
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Misrepresented: Case Law | The Johals cited “Goldstein v. Tong, 2010 BCSC 1234” for the proposition that courts prefer evidence from contractors who physically inspected work over generalized opinions. The tribunal found that citation misleading: 2010 BCSC 1234 is actually J.L. v. British Columbia (Director of the Child, Family, and Community Service Act), concerning custody and the return of a child to Canada.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and misrepresented authority and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and misrepresented authority with a recorded judicial or procedural response in BC CRT. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Misrepresented: Case Law | The Johals cited “Goldstein v. Tong, 2010 BCSC 1234” for the proposition that courts prefer evidence from contractors who physically inspected work over generalized opinions. The tribunal found that citation misleading: 2010 BCSC 1234 is actually J.L. v. British Columbia (Director of the Child, Family, and Community Service Act), concerning custody and the return of a child to Canada.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and misrepresented authority with a recorded judicial or procedural response in BC CRT. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtBC CRT
Jurisdictioninternational
CircuitNot recorded
DateOct 22, 2026
NO
AI toolNo tool named in source
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeSee source
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Misrepresented: Case Law | The Johals cited “Goldstein v. Tong, 2010 BCSC 1234” for the proposition that courts prefer evidence from contractors who physically inspected work over generalized opinions. The tribunal found that citation misleading: 2010 BCSC 1234 is actually J.L. v. British Columbia (Director of the Child, Family, and Community Service Act), concerning custody and the return of a child to Canada.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Ocean Wave Drywall Ltd. v. Johal?
Misrepresented: Case Law | The Johals cited “Goldstein v. Tong, 2010 BCSC 1234” for the proposition that courts prefer evidence from contractors who physically inspected work over generalized opinions. The tribunal found that citation misleading: 2010 BCSC 1234 is actually J.L. v. British Columbia (Director of the Child, Family, and Community Service Act), concerning custody and the return of a child to Canada.
Why does Ocean Wave Drywall Ltd. v. Johal matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and misrepresented authority with a recorded judicial or procedural response in BC CRT. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Ocean Wave Drywall Ltd. v. Johal?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Ocean Wave Drywall Ltd. v. Johal summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Blanes v. Stellers Jay Academy Inc.BC CRT · May 28, 2026same court · pro se + misrepresented authorityLangen v. The Owners, Strata Plan EPS5455BC CRT · Apr 14, 2026same court · pro se + misrepresented authorityWhite v. The Owners, Strata Plan BCS3946BC CRT · Feb 27, 2026same court · pro se + misrepresented authorityObermann v. Spring Financial Inc.BC CRT · Nov 28, 2025same court · pro se + misrepresented authorityWyszynski v. The Owners, Strata Plan BCS1721BC CRT · Jun 1, 2026same court · pro se + misrepresented authorityMargolles v. The Owners, Strata Plan VR 2477BC CRT · Apr 27, 2026same court · pro se + contract

This record comes from Canada. See Fictitious citations in Canadian courts for counts across the corpus and the court guidance on AI.

This record involves a self-represented party. See all pro se litigant AI hallucination decisions in the corpus, with counts by year, country and outcome.

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.