STATE EVIDENCE REPORT

Hawaii

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records8

Source linked100%

Known USD amount total$1,200

Recorded rangeAug 20, 2024 – Oct 8, 2026

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What patterns appear in the public records associated with Hawaii?

AI Vortex currently links 8 source-linked public matters associated with Hawaii. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (7), Misrepresented authority (2) and Fabricated or altered quotations (1). Recorded responses and outcomes include Monetary sanction (3), No adjudicated consequence recorded (3) and Warning or admonishment (2). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the state.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.

OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Fabricated authorities7 · 87.5%Misrepresented authority2 · 25%Fabricated or altered quotations1 · 12.5%

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.

RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

Monetary sanction3 · 37.5%No adjudicated consequence recorded3 · 37.5%Warning or admonishment2 · 25%Bar or professional referral1 · 12.5%

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

Pro Se Litigant6 · 75%Lawyer2 · 25%

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

Contract2 · 25%Criminal2 · 25%Other2 · 25%Civil Rights1 · 12.5%

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 8 of 8

Oct 8, 2026U.S. Bank Trust National Association, as Trustee of the Chalet Series IV Trust v. Rosy Esprecion ThomasHawaii ICANo tool named in sourceSource

Aug 31, 2026State of Hawaii v. Cody PrestiICA HawaiiNo tool named in sourceSource

May 5, 2026Moore v. MC Architects Inc., et al.D. Hawai'iUnidentifiedSource

Oct 31, 2025Kaleb Alexander Hoosier v. Executive Centre Association, et al.D. Hawai‘iAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jul 24, 2025Taft v. Thomas et al.HawaiiAI (implied, unspecified)Source

May 15, 2025Keaau Development Partnership LLC v. LawrenceHawaii ICAAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Mar 11, 2025210S LLC v. Di WuHawaiiNo tool named in sourceSource

Aug 20, 2024Martin v. Hawai'iD. HawaiiUnidentifiedSource

Open all matching records

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE

Related corpus profiles

United States8 shared records Fake Citations7 shared records None Adjudicated3 shared records Monetary3 shared records Misrepresented Authority2 shared records Warning2 shared records

Cite this page

Bluebook: AI Vortex, Hawaii (state) Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 26, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/states/hi/report (last visited Oct. 26, 2026).
APA: AI Vortex. (2026, October 26). Hawaii (state) Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 26, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/states/hi/report
URL: https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/states/hi/report (accessed 2026-10-26)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.