HomeCasesMoore v. MC Architects Inc., et al.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Moore v. MC Architects Inc., et al.

D. Hawai'i · May 5, 2026

HI / federalEditorial impact: mediumfake citationscontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Court identified multiple record- and case-citation errors in plaintiff's oppositions that the court tied to use of AI tools; counsel admitted client used AI and accepted responsibility. Outcome: Monetary Sanction.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Monetary Sanction; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects fake citations and contract involving Unidentified with Monetary Sanction in D. Hawai'i, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and contract involving Unidentified with Monetary Sanction in D. Hawai'i, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

HawaiiSingle-state evidence scope

Jurisdiction contextThe state marker is derived from the structured case record.

CourtD. Hawai'i

Jurisdictionfederal

Circuit9th Circuit

DateMay 5, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeMonetary Sanction

Known amount$1,000

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Monetary Sanction

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Court identified multiple record- and case-citation errors in plaintiff's oppositions that the court tied to use of AI tools; counsel admitted client used AI and accepted responsibility.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Moore v. MC Architects Inc., et al.?: Fabricated: Case Law | Court identified multiple record- and case-citation errors in plaintiff's oppositions that the court tied to use of AI tools; counsel admitted client used AI and accepted responsibility. Outcome: Monetary Sanction.
Why does Moore v. MC Architects Inc., et al. matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects fake citations and contract involving Unidentified with Monetary Sanction in D. Hawai'i, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Moore v. MC Architects Inc., et al.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Moore v. MC Architects Inc., et al. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Keaau Development Partnership LLC v. LawrenceHawaii ICA · May 15, 2025same jurisdiction · fake citations + contract Martin v. Hawai'iD. Hawaii · Aug 20, 2024same jurisdiction · fake citations + trial Progressive Northern Insurance Company v. Tony Pete Flores, et al.D. Nevada · Jul 13, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: Unidentified Bailey v. Sedgwick Claims Management Services, Inc.W.D. Tennessee · Jun 8, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: Unidentified Mary McGreevy v. Adam WitkinSC Oregon · Jun 4, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: Unidentified Strategic Funding Source, Inc. v. STI-NY, LLCSC New York · May 28, 2026fake citations + contract · same recorded tool: Unidentified

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court Open jurisdiction map

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

Questions this record answers

What happened in Moore v. MC Architects Inc., et al.?

Why does Moore v. MC Architects Inc., et al. matter for legal AI risk?

What does the public record establish about Moore v. MC Architects Inc., et al.?

Which source supports this Moore v. MC Architects Inc., et al. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.