Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
STATE EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-1QL29X7Generated September 12, 2026Evidence checked Sep 11, 2026
STATE EVIDENCE REPORT

Louisiana

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records15
Source linked100%
Known amount total$11,868
Recorded rangeAug 11, 2025 May 20, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What patterns appear in the public records associated with Louisiana?

AI Vortex currently links 15 source-linked public matters associated with Louisiana. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (12), Fabricated or altered quotations (8) and Misrepresented authority (7). Recorded responses and outcomes include Monetary sanction (10), Bar or professional referral (5) and Professional discipline (5). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the state.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 15
May 20, 2026Taiujuan Burches v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, et al.E.D. LouisianaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
May 18, 2026Herbert Brooks v. Lowes Home Centers LLCW.D. LouisianaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
May 12, 2026Jacobs v. TimberlakeCA Louisiana (5d)AI (implied, unspecified)Source
May 11, 2026Taiujuan Burches v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, et al.E.D. LousianaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Apr 9, 2026In re Troylond Malon WiseW.D. Louisiana (Bankruptcy)UnidentifiedSource
Mar 27, 2026Rushing v. Turner19th JD, LouisianaEVESource
Mar 20, 2026Daniel Gentry v. Calvin Thompson et al.E.D. LouisianaChatGPTSource
Mar 6, 2026Kattom v. BondiW.D. LouisianaChatGPTSource
Mar 5, 2026Woodward Harbor L.L.C., et al. v. City of MandevilleE.D. LouisianaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Nov 6, 2025Travis C. Mills et al. v. Rocket Mortgage LLC et al.W.D. LouisianaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Oct 23, 2025In re: Sanctions Order of KenneyCA LouisianaChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, GoogleSource
Oct 2, 2025Robenson Lafontant v. Coolidge-CLK St. GermaineE.D. LouisianaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.