Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Jul 27, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 24, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Source-linked corpus view
LA
LA appears in 15 of 1,809 public corpus records (0.8%). This page describes the recorded dataset, not an incidence rate, prevalence of AI use, or a prediction of future outcomes.
What patterns appear in the public records associated with LA?
AI Vortex currently links 15 source-linked public matters associated with LA. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (12), Fabricated or altered quotations (8) and Misrepresented authority (7). Recorded responses and outcomes include Monetary sanction (10), Bar or professional referral (5) and Professional discipline (5). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the state.
Every count below links to the exact matching records. The linked source, subsequent docket history, and local procedural context remain controlling.
Observed issue mix
What problems appear in these records?
Fabricated authorities12 · 80%Fabricated or altered quotations8 · 53.3%Misrepresented authority7 · 46.7%
Issue categories can overlap within a single matter.
Recorded consequences
How did courts or authorities respond?
Monetary sanction10 · 66.7%Bar or professional referral5 · 33.3%Professional discipline5 · 33.3%Warning or admonishment4 · 26.7%Filing or pleading struck1 · 6.7%No adjudicated consequence recorded1 · 6.7%
Response categories can overlap and do not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
Participant context
Who appears in these matters?
Matter context
Which practice areas are represented?
Attribution status
How is AI involvement recorded?
Unspecified attribution is not evidence that a particular vendor was used.
Corpus evolution
When were these matters recorded?
Public records in this view
Showing the most recent 15 of 15 matching records.
Taiujuan Burches v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, et al.E.D. Louisiana · LA · AI (implied, unspecified)
May 20, 2026Herbert Brooks v. Lowes Home Centers LLCW.D. Louisiana · LA · AI (implied, unspecified)
May 18, 2026Jacobs v. TimberlakeCA Louisiana (5d) · LA · AI (implied, unspecified)
May 12, 2026Taiujuan Burches v. Equifax Information Services, LLC, et al.E.D. Lousiana · LA · AI (implied, unspecified)
May 11, 2026In re Troylond Malon WiseW.D. Louisiana (Bankruptcy) · LA · Unidentified
Apr 9, 2026Rushing v. Turner19th JD, Louisiana · LA · EVE
Mar 27, 2026Daniel Gentry v. Calvin Thompson et al.E.D. Louisiana · LA · ChatGPT
Mar 20, 2026Kattom v. BondiW.D. Louisiana · LA · ChatGPT
Mar 6, 2026Woodward Harbor L.L.C., et al. v. City of MandevilleE.D. Louisiana · LA · AI (implied, unspecified)
Mar 5, 2026Travis C. Mills et al. v. Rocket Mortgage LLC et al.W.D. Louisiana · LA · AI (implied, unspecified)
Nov 6, 2025In re: Sanctions Order of KenneyCA Louisiana · LA · ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Google
Oct 23, 2025Robenson Lafontant v. Coolidge-CLK St. GermaineE.D. Louisiana · LA · AI (implied, unspecified)
Oct 2, 2025Lee v. R&R Home Care, Inc.E.D. Louisiana · LA · Google Gemini
Aug 28, 2025Woody Nora v. M & A Transport, Inc., et al.E.D. Louisiana · LA · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 13, 2025Herr v. Elos Environmental, LLCE.D. Louisiana · LA · AI (implied, unspecified)
Aug 11, 2025Scope and limitation
This page groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish a judge’s general practices or sanction rate. For every entity type, the view is not a comparison against unobserved proceedings.
Indexing status
This entity meets the public indexing baseline of at least 3 source-linked records.