Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 95/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
In re: Sanctions Order of Kenney
CA Louisiana · Oct 23, 2025
LA / stateEditorial impact: highfake citationsfabricated quotesmisrepresented authoritybar referral
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Court found 'Burns v. State, 813 So.2d 574 (La. App. 1 Cir. 2001)' was entirely fabricated by generative AI and did not exist; reporter/page numbers pointed to unrelated cases. Outcome: Costs order, 3 hours CLE on ethical use of generative AI, referral to Office of Disciplinary Counsel.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Costs order, 3 hours CLE on ethical use of generative AI, referral to Office of Disciplinary Counsel; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Stacking ChatGPT, Copilot, and Google without verification triggers costs, mandatory CLE, and disciplinary referral in one order.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Court found 'Burns v. State, 813 So.2d 574 (La. App. 1 Cir. 2001)' was entirely fabricated by generative AI and did not exist; reporter/page numbers pointed to unrelated cases. Outcome: Costs order, 3 hours CLE on ethical use of generative AI, referral to Office of Disciplinary Counsel.
Operational lesson
Stacking ChatGPT, Copilot, and Google without verification triggers costs, mandatory CLE, and disciplinary referral in one order.
Record details
LouisianaSingle-state evidence scope
CourtCA Louisiana
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit5th Circuit
DateOct 23, 2025
CH
AI toolChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Google
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeCosts order, 3 hours CLE on ethical use of generative AI, referral to Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Known amount$1,368
Professional sanctionYes
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
reported
ChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, Google is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture
Costs order, 3 hours CLE on ethical use of generative AI, referral to Office of Disciplinary Counsel
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court found 'Burns v. State, 813 So.2d 574 (La. App. 1 Cir. 2001)' was entirely fabricated by generative AI and did not exist; reporter/page numbers pointed to unrelated cases.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court found 'Smith v. Christus St. Patrick Hosp., 20-306 (La. App. 3 Cir. 11/3/20), 308 So.3d 1216' was fabricated by AI and the reporter/page numbers referenced an unrelated case.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court found 'Doe v. Southwest Louisiana Hosp. Ass'n, 02-180 (La. App. 3 Cir. 7/10/02), 833 So.2d 1136' was fabricated by AI; referenced reporter/page numbers pointed to unrelated decisions.
- False Quotes: Case Law | Court determined plaintiff's filing contained a false/altered quotation attributed to Thomas v. Reg'l Health Sys. of Acadiana and an incorrect reporter citation; quotation not found in the actual opinion.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Court found counsel misrepresented the holding of Acara v. Banks by asserting it supports that HIPAA violations may serve as evidence of standard of care in state tort claims; Acara does not support that proposition.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in In re: Sanctions Order of Kenney?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court found 'Burns v. State, 813 So.2d 574 (La. App. 1 Cir. 2001)' was entirely fabricated by generative AI and did not exist; reporter/page numbers pointed to unrelated cases. Outcome: Costs order, 3 hours CLE on ethical use of generative AI, referral to Office of Disciplinary Counsel.
- Why does In re: Sanctions Order of Kenney matter for legal AI risk?
- Stacking ChatGPT, Copilot, and Google without verification triggers costs, mandatory CLE, and disciplinary referral in one order.
- What does the public record establish about In re: Sanctions Order of Kenney?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this In re: Sanctions Order of Kenney summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.