Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
STATE EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-1QL29X7Generated October 27, 2026Evidence checked Oct 26, 2026
STATE EVIDENCE REPORT

Louisiana

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records16
Source linked100%
Known USD amount total$11,868
Recorded rangeAug 11, 2025 – Sep 28, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What patterns appear in the public records associated with Louisiana?

AI Vortex currently links 16 source-linked public matters associated with Louisiana. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (14), Fabricated or altered quotations (8) and Misrepresented authority (7). Recorded responses and outcomes include Monetary sanction (10), Non-monetary order (CLE, community service, apology) (6) and Professional discipline (5). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the state.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 16
May 18, 2026Herbert Brooks v. Lowes Home Centers LLCW.D. LouisianaNo tool named in sourceSource
May 12, 2026Jacobs v. TimberlakeCA Louisiana (5d)AI (implied, unspecified)Source
Apr 9, 2026In re Troylond Malon WiseW.D. Louisiana (Bankruptcy)UnidentifiedSource
Mar 27, 2026Rushing v. Turner19th JD, LouisianaEVESource
Mar 20, 2026Daniel Gentry v. Calvin Thompson et al.E.D. LouisianaChatGPTSource
Mar 6, 2026Kattom v. BondiW.D. LouisianaChatGPTSource
Mar 5, 2026Woodward Harbor L.L.C., et al. v. City of MandevilleE.D. LouisianaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Nov 6, 2025Travis C. Mills et al. v. Rocket Mortgage LLC et al.W.D. LouisianaAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Oct 23, 2025In re: Sanctions Order of KenneyCA LouisianaChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, GoogleSource
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

Cite this page

Bluebook

AI Vortex, Louisiana Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 26, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/states/la/report (last visited Oct. 26, 2026).

APA

AI Vortex. (2026, October 26). Louisiana Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 26, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/states/la/report

URL

https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/states/la/report (accessed 2026-10-26)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.