Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
STATE EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-1N9DCLHGenerated September 12, 2026Evidence checked Sep 12, 2026
STATE EVIDENCE REPORT

New York

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records123
Source linked100%
Known amount total$209,524
Recorded rangeJun 22, 2023 Sep 8, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What patterns appear in the public records associated with New York?

AI Vortex currently links 123 source-linked public matters associated with New York. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (100), Fabricated or altered quotations (45) and Misrepresented authority (45). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (45), No adjudicated consequence recorded (40) and Monetary sanction (24). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the state.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 123
Sep 8, 2026Carter v. City of BuffaloW.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Sep 8, 2026Philippeaux v. United States, et al.S.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Aug 27, 2026Ashmeade v. Amazon.com Services LLCS.D. New YorkUnidentifiedSource
Aug 7, 2026Brown v. Real Estate Capital of America et al.SC New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Aug 5, 2026Mary-Rose F. Calenzo v. Waste Management, Inc.N.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Aug 4, 2026Kleyman Law Group, P.C. v. KaloidisSC New YorkClaude and other generative AI platformsSource
Jul 31, 2026Fernando Justino Santana v. Shook Hardy & Bacon, et al.S.D. New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jul 31, 2026Mendel S. v. Faigy S.Family Court New YorkUnidentifiedSource
Jul 22, 2026Rodriguez v. Time Warner EntertainmentSC New YorkAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.