STATE EVIDENCE REPORT

Oregon

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records27

Source linked100%

Known amount total$131,848

Recorded rangeJun 25, 2025 – Jul 31, 2026

EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What patterns appear in the public records associated with Oregon?

AI Vortex currently links 27 source-linked public matters associated with Oregon. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (25), Misrepresented authority (11) and Fabricated or altered quotations (8). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (9), Monetary sanction (8) and Filing or pleading struck (6). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the state.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.

OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Fabricated authorities25 · 92.6%Misrepresented authority11 · 40.7%Fabricated or altered quotations8 · 29.6%

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.

RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

Warning or admonishment9 · 33.3%Monetary sanction8 · 29.6%Filing or pleading struck6 · 22.2%No adjudicated consequence recorded5 · 18.5%Dismissal or adverse disposition4 · 14.8%Order to show cause1 · 3.7%

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.

PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

Pro Se Litigant20 · 74.1%Lawyer7 · 25.9%

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

Contract7 · 25.9%Tort5 · 18.5%Administrative4 · 14.8%Criminal2 · 7.4%Other2 · 7.4%

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 27

Jul 31, 2026United States of America v. Eric Karnezis et al.D. OregonAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jul 28, 2026Owen v. Askew et al.D. OregonAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jul 15, 2026State v. DixonCA OregonAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jun 29, 2026Michael J. Cross v. PHH Mortgage Corporation, et al.D. OregonAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Jun 4, 2026Mary McGreevy v. Adam WitkinSC OregonUnidentifiedSource

May 19, 2026REDACTED v. United States Citizenship and Immigration ServicesD. OregonAI (implied, unspecified)Source

May 6, 2026Boersma v. DavenportCA OregonAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Apr 22, 2026Carol L. Williams v. Tracy HonlCA OregonUnidentifiedSource

Apr 10, 2026Steven Nemec v. Kelsey Kanoelani Alao and Alyssa Jade AlaoD. OregonAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Apr 6, 2026Kelly Bartholomew v. Public Utility Commission of OregonCA OregonUnidentifiedSource

Mar 30, 2026Shaun Fleck v. Del-One Federal Credit UnionD. OregonUnidentifiedSource

Mar 30, 2026Yves Hector Vimegnon v. Gallagher Bassett Services, Inc.D. OregonAI (implied, unspecified)Source

Open all matching records

EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

CONNECTED INTELLIGENCE

Related corpus profiles

United States27 shared records Fake Citations25 shared records D. Oregon16 shared records Misrepresented Authority11 shared records Warning9 shared records Fabricated Quotes8 shared records