Loading AI Vortex evidence…
Preparing the requested public record.
Public trackerEvidence checked Jul 23, 2026 · Latest decision Jul 21, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 90/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.
Shaun Fleck v. Del-One Federal Credit Union
D. Oregon · Mar 30, 2026
OR / federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationscontracttrial
Direct answer
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'FutureGrowth Corp. v. SEC, 955 F. Supp. 3d 441 (S.D.N.Y. 2025)'; the Court and defendant could not locate the case and the Court found the citation fabricated (Westlaw only showed Fleck's own filing). Outcome: Warning.
- Why the court cared
- The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
- Why it matters now
- Westlaw self-citation loops are a tell: if only the filer's own brief shows, the cite is fabricated.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'FutureGrowth Corp. v. SEC, 955 F. Supp. 3d 441 (S.D.N.Y. 2025)'; the Court and defendant could not locate the case and the Court found the citation fabricated (Westlaw only showed Fleck's own filing). Outcome: Warning.
Operational lesson
Westlaw self-citation loops are a tell: if only the filer's own brief shows, the cite is fabricated.
Record details
OregonSingle-state evidence scope
CourtD. Oregon
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit9th Circuit
DateMar 30, 2026
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeWarning
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary
What the record establishes about AI use
not established
The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.
Procedural posture
Warning
Correction behavior
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
1 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'FutureGrowth Corp. v. SEC, 955 F. Supp. 3d 441 (S.D.N.Y. 2025)'; the Court and defendant could not locate the case and the Court found the citation fabricated (Westlaw only showed Fleck's own filing).
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Shaun Fleck v. Del-One Federal Credit Union?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiff cited 'FutureGrowth Corp. v. SEC, 955 F. Supp. 3d 441 (S.D.N.Y. 2025)'; the Court and defendant could not locate the case and the Court found the citation fabricated (Westlaw only showed Fleck's own filing). Outcome: Warning.
- Why does Shaun Fleck v. Del-One Federal Credit Union matter for legal AI risk?
- Westlaw self-citation loops are a tell: if only the filer's own brief shows, the cite is fabricated.
- What does the public record establish about Shaun Fleck v. Del-One Federal Credit Union?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Shaun Fleck v. Del-One Federal Credit Union summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.