Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
STATE EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-1FIL9VKGenerated September 12, 2026Evidence checked Sep 11, 2026
STATE EVIDENCE REPORT

Wisconsin

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records16
Source linked100%
Known amount total$5,000
Recorded rangeSep 15, 2023 Jul 30, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What patterns appear in the public records associated with Wisconsin?

AI Vortex currently links 16 source-linked public matters associated with Wisconsin. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (14), Misrepresented authority (9) and Fabricated or altered quotations (5). Recorded responses and outcomes include Warning or admonishment (9), Monetary sanction (2) and No adjudicated consequence recorded (2). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the state.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 12 of 16
Jul 30, 2026First Community Credit Union v. Ashley SmithCA WisconsinAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jun 23, 2026Xinyue Hippe v. Retention Brands, LLCE.D. WisconsinAI (implied, unspecified)Source
May 11, 2026William Louis Armstrong, III v. City of MilwaukeeE.D. WisconsinAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Feb 6, 2026State v. GarrettCC WisconsinAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Jan 30, 2026SEC v. Joseph Nantomah et al.E.D. WisconsinAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Dec 18, 2025Gerou v. George, Whitten, and United StatesE.D. WisconsinAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Nov 4, 2025Alaya Coleman v. RPF-Somers Investors, LLC, et al.E.D. WisconsinAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Nov 4, 2025Todd E. Glass v. Foley & Lardner LLPW.D. WisconsinAI (implied, unspecified)Source
Sep 18, 2025Pelishek v. City of SheboyganE.D. WisconsinWestlaw's Quick Check and AI Case Search ToolSource
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.