First Community Credit Union v. Ashley Smith
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0); document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
CA Wisconsin · Jul 30, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited Gielow v. Napiorkowski and misrepresented the proposition and page—court identified this as a false/misleading citation in the brief. Outcome: Warning: the court of appeals found false legal citations in the appellant's briefing that violate the briefing rules and cautioned her not to repeat this in any court (Opinion, PDF p. 9).
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Warning: the court of appeals found false legal citations in the appellant's briefing that violate the briefing rules and cautioned her not to repeat this in any court (Opinion, PDF p. 9). The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning: the court of appeals found false legal citations in the appellant's briefing that violate the briefing rules and cautioned her not to repeat this in any court (Opinion, PDF p. 9) in CA Wisconsin. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited Gielow v. Napiorkowski and misrepresented the proposition and page—court identified this as a false/misleading citation in the brief. Outcome: Warning: the court of appeals found false legal citations in the appellant's briefing that violate the briefing rules and cautioned her not to repeat this in any court (Opinion, PDF p. 9).
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning: the court of appeals found false legal citations in the appellant's briefing that violate the briefing rules and cautioned her not to repeat this in any court (Opinion, PDF p. 9) in CA Wisconsin. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
Corrected 2026-11-02: see the corrections log.
What the record establishes about AI use
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Warning: the court of appeals found false legal citations in the appellant's briefing that violate the briefing rules and cautioned her not to repeat this in any court (Opinion, PDF p. 9)
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited Gielow v. Napiorkowski and misrepresented the proposition and page—court identified this as a false/misleading citation in the brief.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Court observed that some citations in Smith's briefs appeared to be to nonexistent cases or to authorities unrelated to the propositions asserted, consistent with AI 'hallucinations.'
Questions this record answers
- What happened in First Community Credit Union v. Ashley Smith?
- Misrepresented: Case Law | Appellant cited Gielow v. Napiorkowski and misrepresented the proposition and page—court identified this as a false/misleading citation in the brief. Outcome: Warning: the court of appeals found false legal citations in the appellant's briefing that violate the briefing rules and cautioned her not to repeat this in any court (Opinion, PDF p. 9).
- Why does First Community Credit Union v. Ashley Smith matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Warning: the court of appeals found false legal citations in the appellant's briefing that violate the briefing rules and cautioned her not to repeat this in any court (Opinion, PDF p. 9) in CA Wisconsin. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about First Community Credit Union v. Ashley Smith?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this First Community Credit Union v. Ashley Smith summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.