AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
AI visibilityConsultingSearch free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Oct 9, 2026 · Latest decision Oct 8, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesDuckett v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Duckett v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System

W.D. Wisconsin · Oct 7, 2026

WI / federalEditorial impact: lowfake citationsfabricated quotescivil rightstrialWarning
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited Brandon v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of Chi. for the proposition that an ADHD allegation could establish disability at the pleading stage. Defendants identified that the cited case did not exist, and plaintiffs withdrew the citation. Outcome: Admonishment.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies fake citations and fabricated quotes and records Admonishment. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Admonishment in W.D. Wisconsin. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited Brandon v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of Chi. for the proposition that an ADHD allegation could establish disability at the pleading stage. Defendants identified that the cited case did not exist, and plaintiffs withdrew the citation. Outcome: Admonishment.

Operational lesson

This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Admonishment in W.D. Wisconsin. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

WisconsinSingle-state evidence scope
Explore WIOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtW.D. Wisconsin
Jurisdictionfederal
Circuit7th Circuit
DateOct 7, 2026
UN
AI toolUnidentified
Party typeLawyer
OutcomeAdmonishment
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo
Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Admonishment

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited Brandon v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of Chi. for the proposition that an ADHD allegation could establish disability at the pleading stage. Defendants identified that the cited case did not exist, and plaintiffs withdrew the citation.
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs relied on a quotation attributed to Payan, but admitted that the cited case did not exist and withdrew reliance on the quotation.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Duckett v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System?
Fabricated: Case Law | Plaintiffs cited Brandon v. Bd. of Educ. of the City of Chi. for the proposition that an ADHD allegation could establish disability at the pleading stage. Defendants identified that the cited case did not exist, and plaintiffs withdrew the citation. Outcome: Admonishment.
Why does Duckett v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects fake citations and fabricated quotes with Admonishment in W.D. Wisconsin. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Duckett v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Duckett v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Todd E. Glass v. Foley & Lardner LLPW.D. Wisconsin · Nov 4, 2025same court · fake citations + trialPelishek v. City of SheboyganE.D. Wisconsin · Sep 18, 2025same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotesFrier v. HingissE.D. Wisconsin · Sep 15, 2023same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotesBranden Driver v. CNA Financial Corporation et al.E.D. Wisconsin · Jun 1, 2026same jurisdiction · fake citations + fabricated quotesGarcia v. City of Monte Vista, Colorado et al.D. Colorado · Sep 29, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: UnidentifiedKrystal Faye Potterf, et al. v. Drew F. Wessels, et al.E.D. Michigan · Aug 26, 2026fake citations + fabricated quotes · same recorded tool: Unidentified