Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
AI TOOL EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-1PGNLBCGenerated October 27, 2026Evidence checked Oct 26, 2026
AI TOOL EVIDENCE REPORT

Google Gemini

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records11
Source linked100%
Known USD amount total$46,100
Recorded rangeMay 6, 2025 – Sep 9, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What issues and consequences appear in records that identify Google Gemini?

AI Vortex currently links 11 source-linked public matters that identify Google Gemini. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (8), Fabricated or altered quotations (6) and Misrepresented authority (5). Recorded responses and outcomes include Monetary sanction (7), No adjudicated consequence recorded (3) and Bar or professional referral (2). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the tool.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 11 of 11
Sep 9, 2026Beus Gilbert PLLC v. Brigham Young University et al.D. UtahClaude, ChatGPT, and GeminiSource
Aug 5, 2026Southland Homes & Real Estate and Investment, LLC v. LamSC CaliforniaChatGPT and Google GeminiSource
Aug 5, 2026Ulish Kerry Terrace Booker, III v. U.S. Bank National AssociationD. ConnecticutGemini Pro; Perplexity; Cetient Legal AI; ChatGPTSource
Jun 2, 2026Fadi El Bitar v. Julio HernandezW.D. WashingtonGoogle GeminiSource
Apr 2, 2026AGC v Registrar of Land TitlesSC YukonGoogle GeminiSource
Mar 31, 2026Evgeny Yaroshevsky v. Karlin et al.E.D. New YorkGeminiSource
Mar 18, 2026Riddle Aggregates v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueTax CourtGrammarly, ChatGPT, and GeminiSource
Aug 28, 2025Lee v. R&R Home Care, Inc.E.D. LouisianaGoogle GeminiSource
Jul 7, 2025Coomer v. Lindell/MyPillow, Inc. (1)D. ColoradoCo-Pilot, Westlaw’s AI, Gemini, Grok, Claude, ChatGPT, PerplexitySource
May 6, 2025Lacey v. State Farm General InsuranceC.D. CaliforniaCoCounsel, Westlaw Precision, Google GeminiSource
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.

Cite this page

Bluebook

AI Vortex, Google Gemini Evidence Report, Legal AI Risk Tracker (updated Oct. 26, 2026), https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/tools/google-gemini/report (last visited Oct. 26, 2026).

APA

AI Vortex. (2026, October 26). Google Gemini Evidence Report. Legal AI Risk Tracker. Retrieved October 26, 2026, from https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/tools/google-gemini/report

URL

https://www.aivortex.io/legal-ai-risk/tools/google-gemini/report (accessed 2026-10-26)

Cites the AI Vortex page, not the underlying decision; cite the court's own document for the holding.