Back to live profile
Preview
AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK INTELLIGENCE
AI TOOL EVIDENCE REPORTAV-ER-0TTO2ZKGenerated September 12, 2026Evidence checked Sep 11, 2026
AI TOOL EVIDENCE REPORT

Microsoft Copilot

A print-ready review packet of the issues, recorded responses, participant context, and source-linked matters currently associated with this profile.

Matched records7
Source linked100%
Known amount total$2,368
Recorded rangeOct 10, 2024 Jan 30, 2026
EVIDENCE-BASED ANSWER

What issues and consequences appear in records that identify Microsoft Copilot?

AI Vortex currently links 7 source-linked public matters that identify Microsoft Copilot. The most frequently recorded issue signals are Fabricated authorities (5), Misrepresented authority (5) and Fabricated or altered quotations (2). Recorded responses and outcomes include Professional discipline (4), Bar or professional referral (3) and Monetary sanction (3). Categories can overlap within the same matter, and these counts describe this public corpus rather than the overall behavior or sanction rate of the tool.

Every distribution below links to the exact matching records. This report does not convert corpus counts into a behavioral prediction.
OBSERVED ISSUE MIX

What problems appear in these records?

Issue categories can overlap within one matter.
RECORDED RESPONSES

How did courts or authorities respond?

A recorded response does not imply that every matter ended in a sanction.
PARTICIPANT CONTEXT

Who appears in these matters?

MATTER CONTEXT

Which practice areas are represented?

UNDERLYING EVIDENCE

Selected public records behind this report

Showing 7 of 7
Jan 30, 2026PSAHSC v. TchampetHigh CourtMicrosoft Co-PilotSource
Oct 23, 2025In re: Sanctions Order of KenneyCA LouisianaChatGPT, Microsoft Copilot, GoogleSource
Sep 29, 2025ANPV & SAPV v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentUpper TribunalMicrosoft CopilotSource
Aug 27, 2025In re RichburgD. South Carolina (Bankruptcy)Microsoft CoPilotSource
Aug 15, 2025JNE24 v Minister for Immigration and CitizenshipFederal Circuit and Family CourtClaude AI, Microsoft CopilotSource
Oct 10, 2024Matter of WeberCC New YorkMS CopilotSource
Open all matching records
EVIDENCE BOUNDARY

Scope, traceability, and limits

This report groups existing structured public-record fields. For judges, the counts describe matters in which that person is recorded as a decision-maker; they do not establish general practices, sanction rates, or future behavior.

The complete docket, later history, local rules, standing orders, and controlling primary materials remain authoritative.