HomeCasesANPV & SAPV v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 91/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

ANPV & SAPV v Secretary of State for the Home Department

Upper Tribunal · Sep 29, 2025

GBEditorial impact: lowfake citationsmisrepresented authorityimmigrationtrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Grounds cited a Honduras country guidance decision that does not exist; judge found the MN Honduras CG [2016] authority fabricated. Outcome: Show Cause Order.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Show Cause Order; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: Copilot is now generating fake country-guidance authorities; immigration counsel must re-check every CG reference.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Grounds cited a Honduras country guidance decision that does not exist; judge found the MN Honduras CG [2016] authority fabricated. Outcome: Show Cause Order.

Operational lesson

Copilot is now generating fake country-guidance authorities; immigration counsel must re-check every CG reference.

Record details

CourtUpper Tribunal

Jurisdictioninternational

CircuitNot recorded

DateSep 29, 2025

AI toolMicrosoft Copilot

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeShow Cause Order

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

Microsoft Copilot is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Show Cause Order

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Grounds cited a Honduras country guidance decision that does not exist; judge found the MN Honduras CG [2016] authority fabricated.
Fabricated: Case Law | Grounds cited an Eritrea appellate decision that does not exist (YH (Eritrea) [2008] UKAIT 00070); judge accepted counsel's concession that case was fictional.
Misrepresented: Case Law | HK v SSHD [2006] EWCA Civ 1037 was cited as supporting 'trauma-informed principles' but judge found the case does not discuss that; citation misapplied.
Misrepresented: Case Law | MA (Somalia) v SSHD was referenced but counsel produced the Supreme Court decision instead of the Court of Appeal authority relied upon; judge found no support for the asserted proposition.
Misrepresented: Case Law | A citation labelled 'SC (Protection) [2020] UKSC 9' did not match the case title; judge found a citation mismatch and irrelevant authority was cited for internal relocation principles.
Misrepresented: Case Law | R (YH) v SSHD [2010] EWCA Civ 116 was deployed in grounds but judge noted ChatGPT has recently wrongly deployed that case in similar submissions; authority was misused.

Questions this record answers

What happened in ANPV & SAPV v Secretary of State for the Home Department?: Fabricated: Case Law | Grounds cited a Honduras country guidance decision that does not exist; judge found the MN Honduras CG [2016] authority fabricated. Outcome: Show Cause Order.
Why does ANPV & SAPV v Secretary of State for the Home Department matter for legal AI risk?: Copilot is now generating fake country-guidance authorities; immigration counsel must re-check every CG reference.
What does the public record establish about ANPV & SAPV v Secretary of State for the Home Department?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this ANPV & SAPV v Secretary of State for the Home Department summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

UK and R (Munir) v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentUpper Tribunal · Nov 17, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority AK v Secretary of State for the Home DepartmentUpper Tribunal · Oct 6, 2025same court · fake citations + immigration PS v London Borough of WandsworthUpper Tribunal · Jul 14, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Abdul Rahim Seidu v Minister of Citizenship and ImmigrationFederal Court (Canada) · Feb 10, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority Virginia Montoya Cabanas v. Pamela Bondi, et al.S.D. Texas · Nov 13, 2025fake citations + misrepresented authority Serafin v. United States Department of State, et al.E.D. Missouri · Oct 16, 2025fake citations + misrepresented authority

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Grounds cited a Honduras country guidance decision that does not exist; judge found the MN Honduras CG [2016] authority fabricated. Outcome: Show Cause Order.

Operational lesson

Copilot is now generating fake country-guidance authorities; immigration counsel must re-check every CG reference.

Tracked discrepancy record

6 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | Grounds cited a Honduras country guidance decision that does not exist; judge found the MN Honduras CG [2016] authority fabricated.

Fabricated: Case Law | Grounds cited an Eritrea appellate decision that does not exist (YH (Eritrea) [2008] UKAIT 00070); judge accepted counsel's concession that case was fictional.

Misrepresented: Case Law | HK v SSHD [2006] EWCA Civ 1037 was cited as supporting 'trauma-informed principles' but judge found the case does not discuss that; citation misapplied.

Misrepresented: Case Law | MA (Somalia) v SSHD was referenced but counsel produced the Supreme Court decision instead of the Court of Appeal authority relied upon; judge found no support for the asserted proposition.

Misrepresented: Case Law | A citation labelled 'SC (Protection) [2020] UKSC 9' did not match the case title; judge found a citation mismatch and irrelevant authority was cited for internal relocation principles.

Misrepresented: Case Law | R (YH) v SSHD [2010] EWCA Civ 116 was deployed in grounds but judge noted ChatGPT has recently wrongly deployed that case in similar submissions; authority was misused.

Questions this record answers

What happened in ANPV & SAPV v Secretary of State for the Home Department?

Fabricated: Case Law | Grounds cited a Honduras country guidance decision that does not exist; judge found the MN Honduras CG [2016] authority fabricated. Outcome: Show Cause Order.

Why does ANPV & SAPV v Secretary of State for the Home Department matter for legal AI risk?

Copilot is now generating fake country-guidance authorities; immigration counsel must re-check every CG reference.

What does the public record establish about ANPV & SAPV v Secretary of State for the Home Department?

Which source supports this ANPV & SAPV v Secretary of State for the Home Department summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.