A2501117
Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Courtready; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.
BC WCAT · Aug 13, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | The tribunal found that the cited decision did not appear to exist and therefore could not support the appellant’s argument about worker status.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records a recorded judicial or procedural response. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in BC WCAT. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | The tribunal found that the cited decision did not appear to exist and therefore could not support the appellant’s argument about worker status.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in BC WCAT. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Procedural posture is not separately recorded in the current dataset.
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
2 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | The tribunal found that the cited decision did not appear to exist and therefore could not support the appellant’s argument about worker status.
- Misrepresented: Case Law | The tribunal found that the cited decision concerned procedural fairness regarding the timing of a vice-chair’s decision, not workplace status, and therefore did not assist the appellant.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in A2501117?
- Fabricated: Case Law | The tribunal found that the cited decision did not appear to exist and therefore could not support the appellant’s argument about worker status.
- Why does A2501117 matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with a recorded judicial or procedural response in BC WCAT. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about A2501117?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this A2501117 summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.
Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases
One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.