Appeal of PDO Ahuska Joint Venture LLC
ASBCA · Jul 13, 2026
What happened in this matter?
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited Lockheed Martin Corp., ASBCA No. 57525, 13-1 BCA ¶ 35,241 to support that contract interpretation is a question of law for summary judgment; Board found the citation fictitious/miscited and that 13-1 BCA ¶ 35,241 actually addresses Raytheon Missile Systems (a jurisdiction motion), and Lockheed Martin appears at 12-1 BCA ¶ 35,017 which does not support the asserted proposition. Outcome: Citations struck.
- Why the court cared
- The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Citations struck. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
- Why it matters now
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Citations struck in ASBCA. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Why this matter is tracked
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited Lockheed Martin Corp., ASBCA No. 57525, 13-1 BCA ¶ 35,241 to support that contract interpretation is a question of law for summary judgment; Board found the citation fictitious/miscited and that 13-1 BCA ¶ 35,241 actually addresses Raytheon Missile Systems (a jurisdiction motion), and Lockheed Martin appears at 12-1 BCA ¶ 35,017 which does not support the asserted proposition. Outcome: Citations struck.
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Citations struck in ASBCA. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
Record details
What the record establishes about AI use
AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.
Citations struck
Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.
Tracked discrepancy record
4 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited Lockheed Martin Corp., ASBCA No. 57525, 13-1 BCA ¶ 35,241 to support that contract interpretation is a question of law for summary judgment; Board found the citation fictitious/miscited and that 13-1 BCA ¶ 35,241 actually addresses Raytheon Missile Systems (a jurisdiction motion), and Lockheed Martin appears at 12-1 BCA ¶ 35,017 which does not support the asserted proposition.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited Metric Constructors, Inc., ASBCA No. 50843, 99-1 BCA ¶ 30,134 to support that warranties may not be expanded beyond express terms; Board found the citation fictitious and that 99-1 BCA ¶ 30,134 actually addresses Bean Horizon-Weeks Marine and does not concern warranties (Metric Constructors appears at 98-2 BCA ¶ 30,088 and does not support the assertion).
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited Blinderman Constr. Co., ASBCA No. 55770, 09-2 BCA ¶ 34,257 to support warranty principles; Board found the citation fictitious—09-2 BCA ¶ 34,257 corresponds to Vibration and Sound Solutions and does not address warranties, and ASBCA No. 55770 is the docket for AMES Corp., which settled without a decision.
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited J. A. Jones Constr. Co., ASBCA No. 38679, 90-3 BCA ¶ 23,241 to support that warranties may not be implied from performance specs; Board found the citation fictitious—90-3 BCA ¶ 23,241 actually addresses Goetz Demolition and not warranties, and ASBCA No. 38679 corresponds to Camel Manufacturing with no published decision.
Questions this record answers
- What happened in Appeal of PDO Ahuska Joint Venture LLC?
- Fabricated: Case Law | Appellant cited Lockheed Martin Corp., ASBCA No. 57525, 13-1 BCA ¶ 35,241 to support that contract interpretation is a question of law for summary judgment; Board found the citation fictitious/miscited and that 13-1 BCA ¶ 35,241 actually addresses Raytheon Missile Systems (a jurisdiction motion), and Lockheed Martin appears at 12-1 BCA ¶ 35,017 which does not support the asserted proposition. Outcome: Citations struck.
- Why does Appeal of PDO Ahuska Joint Venture LLC matter for legal AI risk?
- This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Citations struck in ASBCA. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
- What does the public record establish about Appeal of PDO Ahuska Joint Venture LLC?
- The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
- Which source supports this Appeal of PDO Ahuska Joint Venture LLC summary?
- The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.
Related matters
Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.