HomeCasesEndure Industries, Inc. v. Defense Health Agency

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 85/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

Endure Industries, Inc. v. Defense Health Agency

ASBCA · Mar 23, 2026

/ federalEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationsmisrepresented authoritycontract

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited PGBA, LLC v. United States to argue procurement structure favored incumbents and rendered participation illusory; Board noted PGBA is a bid protest decision about award protest procedures and does not support Endure's contract argument. Outcome: Warning.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Warning; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Warning in ASBCA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Warning in ASBCA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

CourtASBCA

Jurisdictionfederal

CircuitNot recorded

DateMar 23, 2026

AI toolUnidentified

Party typePro Se Litigant

OutcomeWarning

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Warning

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited PGBA, LLC v. United States to argue procurement structure favored incumbents and rendered participation illusory; Board noted PGBA is a bid protest decision about award protest procedures and does not support Endure's contract argument.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited Russell Corp. v. United States as if it held that an implied-in-fact contract existed when government directed procurement terms; Board noted Russell in fact found no contract and ruled against the contractor.
Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a nonexistent decision, "BMS, Inc. v. United States, 12 Cl. Ct. 33 (1987)"; Board found the case does not exist and that the nearby reporter citation corresponds to Johns-Manville, which does not support Endure's asserted propositions.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Attributed supportive legal statements to the fake BMS citation and to Johns-Manville that were actually either dicta or derived from the contractor's proposed findings; Johns-Manville ultimately ruled against the contractor.
Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited T. Brown Constructors, Inc. v. Pena to support that the government cannot impose procurement controls while denying a contract; Board observed T. Brown involved an existing express contract and contract interpretation, not a denial of contract.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Endure Industries, Inc. v. Defense Health Agency?: Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited PGBA, LLC v. United States to argue procurement structure favored incumbents and rendered participation illusory; Board noted PGBA is a bid protest decision about award protest procedures and does not support Endure's contract argument. Outcome: Warning.
Why does Endure Industries, Inc. v. Defense Health Agency matter for legal AI risk?: This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Warning in ASBCA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Endure Industries, Inc. v. Defense Health Agency?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Endure Industries, Inc. v. Defense Health Agency summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Appeals of Huffman Construction, LLCASBCA · Oct 23, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority DSME Construction Co., Ltd.ASBCA · Mar 13, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Joshua Harris v. Pinnacle Bank (2)N.D. Mississippi · May 7, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified Ellen Michaelis v. Wilmington Savings Fund SocietySC New York · Apr 3, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified Ella and Ramin LLC v. Travelers Insurance CompanyN.D. Illinois · Mar 31, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified Jorge A. Zea v. National Association of REALTORSS.D. Florida · Mar 24, 2026pro se + fake citations · same recorded tool: Unidentified

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Warning in ASBCA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Tracked discrepancy record

5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited Russell Corp. v. United States as if it held that an implied-in-fact contract existed when government directed procurement terms; Board noted Russell in fact found no contract and ruled against the contractor.

Fabricated: Case Law | Cited a nonexistent decision, "BMS, Inc. v. United States, 12 Cl. Ct. 33 (1987)"; Board found the case does not exist and that the nearby reporter citation corresponds to Johns-Manville, which does not support Endure's asserted propositions.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Attributed supportive legal statements to the fake BMS citation and to Johns-Manville that were actually either dicta or derived from the contractor's proposed findings; Johns-Manville ultimately ruled against the contractor.

Misrepresented: Case Law | Cited T. Brown Constructors, Inc. v. Pena to support that the government cannot impose procurement controls while denying a contract; Board observed T. Brown involved an existing express contract and contract interpretation, not a denial of contract.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Endure Industries, Inc. v. Defense Health Agency?

Why does Endure Industries, Inc. v. Defense Health Agency matter for legal AI risk?

This matter connects pro se and fake citations involving Unidentified with Warning in ASBCA, making it a concrete reference point for verification, supervision, and response controls.

What does the public record establish about Endure Industries, Inc. v. Defense Health Agency?

Which source supports this Endure Industries, Inc. v. Defense Health Agency summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.