HomeCasesDSME Construction Co., Ltd.

Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 86/100. It passed the source, context, and standalone-summary checks used for public indexing; individual legal editorial review is not represented.

Corpus matter record

DSME Construction Co., Ltd.

ASBCA · Mar 13, 2026

/ federalEditorial impact: mediumfake citationsmisrepresented authoritycontracttrial

Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | December 1, 2025 surreply contained eight citations to cases that do not exist; Board accepted appellant's admission and struck the surreply. Outcome: Brief struck.

Why the court cared: The record concerns whether authorities presented to the decision-maker existed and could be verified. The tracked outcome is Brief struck; the linked source controls the precise reasoning.
Why it matters now: Admitting AI fabrications early and striking the brief beats stonewalling — but still requires a firm verification protocol going forward.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | December 1, 2025 surreply contained eight citations to cases that do not exist; Board accepted appellant's admission and struck the surreply. Outcome: Brief struck.

Operational lesson

Admitting AI fabrications early and striking the brief beats stonewalling — but still requires a firm verification protocol going forward.

Record details

CourtASBCA

Jurisdictionfederal

CircuitNot recorded

DateMar 13, 2026

AI toolAI (implied, unspecified)

Party typeLawyer

OutcomeBrief struck

Known amountNot recorded

Professional sanctionNo

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

reported

AI (implied, unspecified) is recorded in the source dataset; confirm the basis in the linked document.

Procedural posture

Brief struck

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | December 1, 2025 surreply contained eight citations to cases that do not exist; Board accepted appellant's admission and struck the surreply.
Fabricated: Case Law | Opening brief included one citation to a non-existent case (admitted by appellant).
Fabricated: Case Law | January 9, 2026 brief on the vitiation issue cited one fictitious case (admitted by appellant).
Fabricated: Legal Norm | Briefs included fictitious Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) citations (government identified four fictitious FAR cites).
Misrepresented: Case Law | Government identified several citations that misrepresented the holdings of existing cases (some citations appeared to misstate holdings).

Questions this record answers

What happened in DSME Construction Co., Ltd.?: Fabricated: Case Law | December 1, 2025 surreply contained eight citations to cases that do not exist; Board accepted appellant's admission and struck the surreply. Outcome: Brief struck.
Why does DSME Construction Co., Ltd. matter for legal AI risk?: Admitting AI fabrications early and striking the brief beats stonewalling — but still requires a firm verification protocol going forward.
What does the public record establish about DSME Construction Co., Ltd.?: The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this DSME Construction Co., Ltd. summary?: The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Endure Industries, Inc. v. Defense Health AgencyASBCA · Mar 23, 2026same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Appeals of Huffman Construction, LLCASBCA · Oct 23, 2025same court · fake citations + misrepresented authority Cames et al. v. Lowe's Home CentersM.D. Florida · Jul 16, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)Burlingame v. Argo Private Client Group Ltd, et al.N.D. Ohio · Jul 8, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)BFG Corporation v. Pierce RE Holdings et al.N.D. Illinois · Jun 30, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)CIBC Mortgages Inc v Reina FloresManitoba C.A. · Jun 12, 2026fake citations + misrepresented authority · same recorded tool: AI (implied, unspecified)

Linked evidence record

Damien Charlotin case archive

Publisher document archive
The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive.

Open recorded source

Publication statusevidence baseline passed

Published by AI Vortex · Manu Ayala
Page updated Jul 27, 2026

Source host classified Attribution boundary stated Limitations disclosed

Corpus checked Jul 23, 2026; latest tracked decision Jul 21, 2026. AI Vortex summarizes public records and does not replace the court document or legal research service.

Use this record

Open case brief Cases from this court

Evidence boundary

The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.

Read methodology

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | December 1, 2025 surreply contained eight citations to cases that do not exist; Board accepted appellant's admission and struck the surreply. Outcome: Brief struck.

Operational lesson

Admitting AI fabrications early and striking the brief beats stonewalling — but still requires a firm verification protocol going forward.

Tracked discrepancy record

5 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

Fabricated: Case Law | December 1, 2025 surreply contained eight citations to cases that do not exist; Board accepted appellant's admission and struck the surreply.

Fabricated: Case Law | Opening brief included one citation to a non-existent case (admitted by appellant).

Fabricated: Case Law | January 9, 2026 brief on the vitiation issue cited one fictitious case (admitted by appellant).

Fabricated: Legal Norm | Briefs included fictitious Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) citations (government identified four fictitious FAR cites).

Misrepresented: Case Law | Government identified several citations that misrepresented the holdings of existing cases (some citations appeared to misstate holdings).

Questions this record answers

What happened in DSME Construction Co., Ltd.?

Fabricated: Case Law | December 1, 2025 surreply contained eight citations to cases that do not exist; Board accepted appellant's admission and struck the surreply. Outcome: Brief struck.

Why does DSME Construction Co., Ltd. matter for legal AI risk?

Admitting AI fabrications early and striking the brief beats stonewalling — but still requires a firm verification protocol going forward.

What does the public record establish about DSME Construction Co., Ltd.?

Which source supports this DSME Construction Co., Ltd. summary?

The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.