AI VORTEXLEGAL AI RISK
Search free
Public trackerCorpus refreshed Nov 7, 2026 · Latest decision Nov 3, 2026Public incidents are risk signals, not usage-adjusted rates
HomeCasesBisher v. Civic, et al.
Evidence-linked corpus record: this page is generated from the structured public record and has a publication-readiness score of 81/100. It is publicly indexable with its documented evidence gaps stated on-page; the linked source and evidence boundary remain controlling.
Corpus matter record

Bisher v. Civic, et al.

Record source: imported from Damien Charlotin’s AI Hallucination Cases Database (CC BY 4.0), which credits Jesse Schaefer; document hosted in his archive: open the upstream document. What AI Vortex adds.

Cite this record

Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 3, 2026

PA / stateEditorial impact: lowpro sefake citationstorttrialWarning
Direct answer

What happened in this matter?

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellants' brief cited a case that does not exist (identified by the court as a fabricated authority). Outcome: Admonishment.

Why the court cared
The structured public record identifies pro se and fake citations and records Admonishment. The linked source controls the precise reasoning and procedural context.
Why it matters now
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Admonishment in Superior Court of Pennsylvania. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Why this matter is tracked

Fabricated: Case Law | Appellants' brief cited a case that does not exist (identified by the court as a fabricated authority). Outcome: Admonishment.

Operational lesson

This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Admonishment in Superior Court of Pennsylvania. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.

Record details

PennsylvaniaSingle-state evidence scope
Explore PAOpen its source-linked jurisdiction page and related matters.
CourtSuperior Court of Pennsylvania
Jurisdictionstate
Circuit3rd Circuit
DateAug 3, 2026
First seenAug 9, 2026 (in this dataset)
AI toolNo tool named in source
Party typePro Se Litigant
OutcomeAdmonishment
Known amountNot recorded
Professional sanctionNo

Corrected 2026-11-03: see the corrections log.

Attribution boundary

What the record establishes about AI use

not established

The current record does not establish a specific AI tool. Do not infer AI use beyond the source.

Procedural posture

Admonishment

Correction behavior

Correction behavior is not separately verified in the current record.

Tracked discrepancy record

3 citation, quotation, or authority issues are recorded in the source dataset.

  1. Fabricated: Case Law | Appellants' brief cited a case that does not exist (identified by the court as a fabricated authority).
  2. Fabricated: Case Law | Appellants cited another non-existent authority in their brief; the court flagged it as fabricated.
  3. Fabricated: Case Law | Appellants cited a non-existent case in support of their rule that summary judgment may not be entered where discovery is incomplete.

Questions this record answers

What happened in Bisher v. Civic, et al.?
Fabricated: Case Law | Appellants' brief cited a case that does not exist (identified by the court as a fabricated authority). Outcome: Admonishment.
Why does Bisher v. Civic, et al. matter for legal AI risk?
This matter connects pro se and fake citations with Admonishment in Superior Court of Pennsylvania. It provides a source-linked baseline for verification, supervision, and response controls.
What does the public record establish about Bisher v. Civic, et al.?
The record summarizes the outcome described in the linked public source. The recorded document is hosted in the upstream publisher archive. This page is not a substitute for the complete docket, subsequent history, or jurisdiction-specific advice.
Which source supports this Bisher v. Civic, et al. summary?
The recorded source is Damien Charlotin case archive. It is classified as publisher document archive; review the linked material and subsequent docket history before relying on this summary.

Related matters

Related by court, jurisdiction, tool, or classified failure pattern. Similarity does not imply the same facts or outcome.

Dorothea Bell v. Kelly BellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · May 11, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsWoodley v. GottschallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · Sep 1, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsPaige Kiser & Ty Kiser v. DeSimone Auto Group et al.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 27, 2026same court · fake citations + tortZoryana Kaspryak v. Mykhaylo StadarskyySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · Aug 19, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsJaclyn Cocco v. Rosario Palmieri, Jr.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · May 29, 2026same court · pro se + fake citationsA.C. Appellant v. H.D. AND J.C.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · Mar 13, 2026same court · pro se + fake citations

This record involves a self-represented party. See all pro se litigant AI hallucination decisions in the corpus, with counts by year, country and outcome.

Weekly alert

Weekly alert: new AI-hallucination court cases

One short email a week with the newly recorded cases, courts and sanctions. Free, no spam, unsubscribe anytime.